My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-03-18_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2014-03-18_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 12:50:52 PM
Creation date
3/18/2014 1:16:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/18/2014
From
Trapper Mining, Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2013
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JLE
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
668
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
well GD -2 in 1998 than those observed in 1986 after six wet years indicates the post -mine levels <br />under the same conditions may be higher. Springs are not expected to develop at the north end of the <br />D, F and K pits. <br />The water -level changes for the HI aquifer have generally been influenced less by higher than <br />average recharge in 2005 through 2011, the very low precipitation in 2012, and closer to normal in <br />2013. The mining upgradient of HI well GF-4, which occurred several years ago, has been long <br />enough in the past to allow water levels to fully recover. The water levels in this HI aquifer well <br />seem to be varying only slightly with changes in recharge rates. Water levels in this well were overall <br />slightly higher in 2007 through 2013 with the above normal precipitation except for the low 2012 <br />value. The elevation of the backfill springs likely limits the head buildup in the backfill aquifer, <br />which, in turn, limits the maximum head in the downgradient coal aquifer. Fairly steady to slightly <br />higher water -level responses were observed in the two backfill equivalent HI aquifer wells GF -5 and <br />GF -7. Water levels seem to have reached recovered levels in these two wells. The development of <br />backfill springs may limit the maximum water level in some of these areas of the A pit but the <br />backfill aquifer will maintain less fluctuation in water levels down gradient of the pit. <br />Water levels in the backfill areas are depressed and are not likely to ever recover to pre-mine <br />levels except near the northern end of the mine area. Map 2 -1 shows that the levels in the backfill <br />and downgradient aquifers are similar. Well pairs GD -3 & GD -2 and GF -11 & GF-6 present water <br />levels that are very similar in water -level elevation for the backfill and downgradient QR aquifer <br />well. Mining is significantly increasing the permeability of the backfill aquifers which is a benefit <br />relative to potential yields from the aquifer. The increased permeability will likely not allow water <br />levels to recover to pre-mine levels in the reclaimed pits except near the northern (down -dip) end of <br />Trapper Mining Company 6 -2 <br />2013 Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.