My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-03-18_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2014-03-18_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 12:50:52 PM
Creation date
3/18/2014 1:16:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/18/2014
From
Trapper Mining, Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2013
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JLE
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
668
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
aquifer but could be defining the very small effects of the backfill aquifer upgradient. Sulfate <br />concentrations in backfill well GF -7 overall gradually declined in 2010 and 2013. The water levels <br />for the last few years have been fairly similar in well GF -7, indicating that these changes are not due <br />to new backfill being saturated but likely due to variations in recharge. Sulfate concentrations have <br />stayed low and steady in backfill well GF -5 except a slightly higher value in the first sample in 2013. <br />These small changes may be defining the very small effects of upgradient mining but the changes are <br />well within natural ranges. This monitoring indicates that if the HI aquifer has been affected in these <br />wells by upgradient mining, it has been very small. <br />Sulfate concentrations in well GNP -1, which are shown on Figure B -12, have been highly <br />variable indicating an increasing trend during 2006 and 2007 and an overall similar increasing trend <br />in 2008 through 2013. The water level in well GNP -1 had been steadily increasing for several years <br />prior to becoming fairly steady in 2002 and then gradually increasing the last seven years prior to a <br />small decline in 2012 and 2013. Sulfate concentrations may stay higher and variable while water <br />levels are gradually increasing. Sulfate concentrations in this well should be influenced by the sulfate <br />concentrations in the backfill aquifer upgradient of GNP -1. The sulfate concentrations in well GP -3 <br />had shown a gradual increasing trend but concentrations have been steady the last eleven years. <br />Overall steady sulfate concentrations have been observed in well GP -7. Sulfate concentrations in <br />eastern HI aquifer well GC -1 have been similar to the previous higher values in well GNP -1 and had <br />to be natural until the last few years. Therefore, a sulfate concentration of at least greater than 600 <br />mg/1 is needed to indicate that the increases may be due to the mining operation. The 2013 value <br />from well GC -1 was similar to past values. <br />Figure B -13 presents the sulfate concentrations for three 3rd White Sandstone wells. The <br />previous eleven years of sulfate values from well P -8 had overall gradually decreased while the 2012 <br />Trapper Mining Company 3-6 <br />2013 Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.