My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-03-18_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2014-03-18_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 12:50:52 PM
Creation date
3/18/2014 1:16:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/18/2014
From
Trapper Mining, Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2013
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JLE
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
668
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.0 GROUND - WATER- QUALITY <br />Appendix B presents the ground -water quality data for the Trapper Mine. This appendix <br />tabulates all of the historical data in Table B -1 and presents IDS and sulfate plots versus time to <br />convey changes in the major constituent water quality. <br />Appendix B also, presents the spring and seep water - quality data. Water quality for -the <br />springs and seeps- are included in tliis section because their source is ground water. Section 3.7 <br />presents a discussion of the spring and seep water - quality data. <br />3.1 TOTAL - DISSOLVED SOLIDS.(rDS)_ <br />Figures B -1 through B -7 present plots of the TDS concentrations for the Trapper Mine- <br />wells. The wells have been grouped together based on aquifers. <br />Figure 9-1 presents the TDS concentrations versus time for two QR aquifer wells GD -2 and - <br />GD -3. Well GD -3 is a, backfill well in the, QR aquifer. TDS concentrations had been fairly steady <br />the previous eleven years in well GD=3 but have increased in 2010 and 2011 then declined in 2012 <br />and slightly increased- in 2013. The fluctuation in this backfill aquifer is well - within natural ranges <br />and may be very similar to variations that would have occurred in the QR aquifer at this location. <br />Some of the TDS in the backfill aquifer may be due to leaching from the backfill material. The TDS <br />in this backfill aquifer is greater than it is downgradient in the R Coal at GD -2 which increased. in <br />-concentration in 2008 through 2012 but slightly declined in 2013. This could be the - movement of <br />higher concentration from the GD -3 area to well GD -2. <br />Figure B -2 also presents a group of three QR wells. Well GF -11 is an equivalent QR aquifer <br />well.in the backfill. The 2013 TDS concentrations -were fairly steady in- backfill well GF -11 and is <br />below its peak in 2001 and 2002. Concentrations in -the QR aquifer are monitored downgradient at <br />Trapper Mining Company 3 -1 <br />2013 Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.