My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-03-07_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
2014-03-07_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:40:49 PM
Creation date
3/11/2014 1:22:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/7/2014
Doc Name
Tailing dam report TR33
From
DRMS
To
McClure & Eggleston, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR33
Email Name
WHE
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
type of failure would progress slowly and the operator would have opportunity to intervene in a <br />timely manner, further reducing the likelihood of this failure mode developing. <br />Seismic - induced liquefaction and excessive deformation cause loss of freeboard and <br />overtopping of dam leading to failure. Although the earthquake loading used for design of the <br />San Luis Tailing Facility is significant (PGA = 0.6 g, Magnitude = 7 +), the dam, its foundation, <br />and the tailing materials immediately up- gradient from the dam are currently unsaturated. <br />Liquefaction therefore is not an issue and strength loss of the dam or upstream tailing under <br />seismic shaking does not lead to a credible failure mode for the dam. Deformations (settlement) <br />on the order up to 2 feet are predicted for the design earthquake, but there is sufficient freeboard <br />on the existing ponded area such that overtopping would not occur. The previously ruled out <br />failure mode described in the preceding paragraphs considered a situation in which the design <br />earthquake occurred at a time when there was much more water in the impoundment area <br />following a major flood event. However, as the risk analysis for that potential failure mode <br />concluded, the likelihood of that combination of loading is so remote that the overall risk is well <br />below tolerable risk guidelines. A similar conclusion would likely be the case for this PFM, <br />even if the extended period of inundation were to re- saturate the tailing and/or a portion of the <br />dam embankment. <br />Debris blocking of South Diversion Ditch drop structure causes overtopping of the <br />structure during flood events smaller than a 100 -year flood. This PFM is a subsidiary <br />contributing factor related to development of PFM -1 and does not by itself lead to a unique <br />credible failure mode. Floods more frequent (less volume and flow) than a 100 -year event are <br />unlikely to result in failure of the dam or release of tailing for the reasons described in the <br />discussion of PFM -l. <br />Clogging of under -drain system results in elevated pore pressures within the dam, seepage <br />face emerging high on downstream dam face and slope instability resulting slumping, crest <br />elevation lowering and loss of freeboard. This PFM is a subsidiary contributing factor related <br />to development of PFM -2 and does not by itself lead to a unique credible failure mode. Slope <br />instability and lowering of the dam crest on its own would not lead to overtopping and failure of <br />the dam under normal operating conditions because of the large amount of freeboard and large <br />distance from the dam to the existing small free -water pool. If the under -drain system were to <br />become clogged and at the same time a major flood event inundated the facility there would be a <br />plausible failure mode to consider. However, the likelihood of those combined conditions <br />occurring simultaneously (under -drain malfunction and major flood) is considered remote. All <br />of the piezometers monitoring the dam embankment consistently indicate very low pore <br />pressures, and the drain outlets are flowing, indicating that the under -drain system is functioning <br />properly. The seepage face that has been observed emerging on the downstream slope a few feet <br />above level of the drain outfalls should be investigated and its cause better understood, as <br />discussed in Section 6. That situation is believed to be a localized condition that does not present <br />San Luis Project Miller Geotechnical Consultants <br />Tailing Dam Data Report 50 February 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.