Laserfiche WebLink
recognized in the original Design Report that tailing would have a lower strength at the time than <br />at final consolidation years later). <br />100 150 200 250 300 350 600 450 500 550 600 650 <br />DISTANCE ; FEET , <br />AATTIHAL PROPERTES <br />WTEIII& <br />TrK <br />MATERIAL <br />DESGAPigN <br />VMT W7 (W) <br />SHEAR STRENCTI <br />6i.a`1 <br />b.a <br />169 <br />p91 <br />_ <br />UNSATWATED TAILNGS <br />105 <br />120 <br />30 <br />JOa <br />2.19 <br />SATJRATED TAEJN05• <br />105 <br />120 <br />16 <br />300 <br />ENBANIlWM "A <br />125 <br />135 <br />35 <br />0 <br />FOUMAT93N SOIL <br />125 <br />135 <br />35 <br />6 <br />� �>f M mmi Mi Un4�rtDt�,Y we w wwa v nay <br />STARKITV ANALYSIS SLAMARY <br />FAILURE <br />r" <br />STAM <br />Fos <br />PWVM;ATc <br />Fos• <br />tY1D ACYEL <br />(x p3 <br />f <br />2 9a <br />169 <br />�N <br />_ <br />3.03 <br />2.07 <br />IL1 <br />J T6 <br />2.19 <br />24.3 <br />6.01 <br />2.02 <br />15.3 <br />•OOYK tOP1rtNn V O�aR <br />(Reproduced from SRK, 1995) <br />Figure 4 Results of Upstream Stability Analyses <br />8650 <br />8600 <br />8550 <br />85M <br />8450 <br />700 <br />San Luis Project Miller Geotechnical Consultants <br />Tailing Dam Data Report 9 February 2014 <br />