My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2012-03-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:55:41 PM
Creation date
2/21/2014 9:54:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/30/2012
Doc Name
Defendants Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisd 2010 CV 367
From
Christopher Kamper, Craig R. Carver, Carver, Schwarz, McNab & Baily, LLC
To
District Court, Montrose County, Colorado
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Introduction <br />Plaintiffs' First and Second Claims for Relief in this action allege violations of the <br />Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act, CRS § 34 -33 -101 et seq., and implementing <br />rules and regulations (the "Colorado Coal Program" or the "State Program "). These claims arise <br />from WFC's initial Prime Farmlands soil investigation conducted in 1998 and pre -2008 topsoil <br />management practices on the Morgan Property. However, the identical claims were presented to <br />the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety ( "DRMS" or the "Division ") which <br />reviewed and rejected them by order issued April 23, 2010. Plaintiffs failed to seek review by <br />the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board (the "Board ") within the 90 -day period allowed by <br />CRS § 34- 33- 124(1)(a) and applicable Board rules, or at any time prior to filing this action. <br />Plaintiffs therefore failed to exhaust available administrative remedies, depriving this Court of <br />subject matter jurisdiction to hear their claims. After this suit was filed, plaintiffs attempted to <br />raise these same issues during a permit hearing before the Board, at which point the Board ruled <br />it lacked jurisdiction to hear them. Western Fuels is therefore entitled to dismissal pursuant to <br />C.R. C.P. 12(b)(1) of plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. <br />Statement of Facts <br />I. Background: the Coal Mining Lease and the Mining Operation <br />1. On September 10, 1998, the parties entered the Coal Mining Lease attached <br />hereto as Exhibit 1, as it has been amended from time to time. <br />2. As stated in the Division's order attached as Exhibit 2, active mining entered the <br />lands subject to the Coal Mining Lease (the "Property") in 2004, and has progressed from east to <br />west since that time. Mining of the Property will not be complete until July or August 2012. <br />►J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.