My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2012-03-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:55:41 PM
Creation date
2/21/2014 9:54:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/30/2012
Doc Name
Defendants Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisd 2010 CV 367
From
Christopher Kamper, Craig R. Carver, Carver, Schwarz, McNab & Baily, LLC
To
District Court, Montrose County, Colorado
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Within the applicable 90 -day period, the Division's April 23, 2010 determination <br />(Exhibit 2) was fully reviewable by the Board, and could have been corrected had the Board <br />found any error. Colorado statute, CRS § 34- 33- 124(1)(a) and the rules of the Board, 4 CCR <br />407 -2, Rule 5.03.5 contain identical requirements (in all material respects) concerning formal <br />review by the Board of determinations rendered by the Division. As stated in CRS § 34 -33- <br />124(1) (a), <br />[A]ny person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected by such <br />notice or order or by any modification, vacation, or termination of such notice or <br />order may request review thereof by the board within ninety days after the <br />issuance of the notice or order or within ninety days after its modification, <br />vacation, or termination. <br />At the conclusion of a proceeding under this provision, the Board is required to "make findings <br />of fact and shall issue a written decision, incorporating therein its findings and an order vacating, <br />affirming, modifying, or terminating the notice of violation or cessation order or the <br />modification, vacation, or termination of such notice or order reviewed." CRS § 34 -33- 124(2). <br />Thus, the Board has the power to correct and rectify any error it finds in the Division's actions. <br />The Board also has the power to award "a sum equal to the aggregate amount of all costs and <br />expenses (including attorney fees) which the board determines to have been reasonably incurred <br />by [any] party for or in connection with his participation in such proceedings." CRS § 34 -33- <br />125(5). <br />The Board was therefore just as well - positioned as this Court to rectify any shortcomings <br />or errors in the Division's April 23, 2010 determination, or to award any relief plaintiffs were <br />entitled to had they proven the allegations stated in Exhibits 4 and 5. In fact, the Board and <br />DRMS have continuing jurisdiction and enforcement powers that are not available to this Court. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.