Laserfiche WebLink
10. Paragraph 10 of the Appeal does not require a response. <br />11. The Board admits that the Board, on November 17, 2010, held a <br />hearing concerning Permit Revision No. 6 ( "PR -6 ") to the Permit. The Board has <br />insufficient information to admit or deny the remaining allegations in paragraph <br />11 of the Appeal and, therefore, denies the same. <br />12. The Board admits that, on November 17, 2010, the Board <br />unanimously approved a motion to approve PR -6. The Board has insufficient <br />information to admit or deny the remaining allegations in paragraph 12 of the <br />Appeal and, therefore, denies the same. <br />13. The Board admits that the Appeal was timely filed, as required by <br />section 34 -33 -128, C.R.S. The remaining allegations in paragraph 13 of the <br />Appeal are vague and, therefore, the Board denies the same. <br />14. Paragraph 14 of the Appeal attempts to describe the contents of PR- <br />6. The Board states that PR -6 speaks for itself and is the best evidence of what <br />it provides. <br />15. Paragraph 15 of the Appeal attempts to describe the contents of PR- <br />6. The Board states that PR -6 speaks for itself and is the best evidence of what <br />it provides. <br />16. The Board has insufficient information to admit or deny the <br />allegations in paragraph 16 of the Appeal and, therefore, denies the same. <br />17. Paragraph 17 of the Appeal attempts to describe the contents of <br />PR -6. The Board states that PR -6 speaks for itself and is the best evidence of <br />what it provides. <br />18. The Board denies paragraph 18 of the Appeal and all subparts <br />thereof. <br />19. The Appeal does not contain a paragraph numbered 19. <br />20. The Board admits the allegations of subparagraph (d) of paragraph <br />20 of the Appeal to the extent that the Board denied a request for holding the <br />hearing Nucla, Colorado by order dated October 28, 2010 and that it denied, by <br />order dated November 8, 2010, a request by Plaintiffs JoeEllen Turner and <br />Michael Morgan to continue the hearing date for thirty days. The Board denies <br />that any of its actions were arbitrary, capricious, prejudicial, or violated <br />Plaintiffs' due process rights or any other legal rights. The Board denies the <br />remaining allegations of paragraph 20 of the Appeal and its subparts. <br />3 <br />