My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-18_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2011-04-18_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:41 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 8:08:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/18/2011
Doc Name
Answer of Western Fuels - Colorado, LLC 2010 CV 548
From
Western Fuels Colorado, LLC
To
District Court, Montrose County Colorado
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14. PR -06 speaks for itself. Defendant admits that the entire subject property will be <br />reclaimed as Prime Farmland, but denies the implication that all of the land historically qualified <br />as Prime Farmland, and affirmatively states that the administrative record demonstrates that <br />approximately 30% of the property was not Prime Farmland prior to the commencement of <br />mining activities on the property. <br />15. PR -06 speaks for itself. <br />16. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the <br />allegations of paragraph 16 of the Complaint, and on that basis denies them. <br />17. PR -06 speaks for itself, but this particular paragraph is notably inaccurate. <br />18. Deny, including each and every subpart. <br />19. There is no paragraph 19 of the Complaint. <br />20. Deny, including each and every subpart. <br />21. Deny. <br />22. Admission or denial of the allegations of paragraph 22 is not required, therefore <br />defendant denies any factual allegations contained therein, to the extent there are any. Defendant <br />denies the implication that the acts requested by plaintiffs are required by law. <br />23. Each and every allegation not specifically admitted in paragraphs 1 to 22 of this <br />Answer above is denied. <br />24. Defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any relief. <br />AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES <br />FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE <br />Plaintiffs fail to state a claim based on which relief can be granted. <br />SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE <br />Plaintiffs' claims are barred or limited by applicable statutes of limitations. <br />THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE <br />Some or all of Plaintiffs' claims are barred by their failure to exhaust administrative <br />remedies. <br />FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE <br />Plaintiffs' claims are barred or limited by express contractual waiver and other express <br />terms that constitute a covenant not to sue. <br />{00047771.1 ) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.