My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-29_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2013-01-29_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:31 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:55:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/29/2013
Doc Name
Paintiffs Opening Brief 2010 CV 548
From
Christopher G. McAnany Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, LLP
To
District Court, Montrose County Colorado
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a positive prime farmland determination was made for the Morgan Property in <br />February, 2008 Z <br />Following this determination DRMS ordered that WFC implement changes <br />to its mining and soil handling practices to account for the presence of prime <br />farmland soils. But, as of February, 2008, approximately 51.8 acres of the 108 <br />acre Morgan Property had been stripped of topsoil. Thus, although prospective <br />changes to mining practices were undertaken, unresolved was what to do about <br />those lands that had been mined and stripped of topsoil in violation of the prime <br />farmland regulations of SCMRA. <br />PR6 was submitted to DRMS in November, 2009. PR6 addressed land use <br />designations post- mining, revegetation plans, prime farmland standards, topsoil <br />replacement, and irrigation. Most of the application focused on the Morgan <br />Property, though properties owned by WFC and two other landowners were also <br />affected. <br />Z The Morgan family was excluded from these consultations between the <br />government agencies and WFC, and consequently they were unable to provide any <br />meaningful input as to operational changes that should have been implemented as a <br />result of the positive prime farmland determination. But, the Morgans agree that <br />prime farmlands are present on the Morgan Property. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.