My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-29_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2013-01-29_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:12:31 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:55:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/29/2013
Doc Name
Paintiffs Opening Brief 2010 CV 548
From
Christopher G. McAnany Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn & Krohn, LLP
To
District Court, Montrose County Colorado
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
permit revision request, PR Number 7, with DRMS. PR7 seeks a revision of <br />previous prime farmland determinations, soil redistribution, and vegetation plans. <br />That application is under review by DRMS, and there remains a question as to <br />whether it will render PR6 moot, or whether PR 7 is essentially an attempt to roll <br />back previously enacted prime farmland protections. <br />The Record also reflects that the federal Office of Surface Mining (OSM), <br />which exercises oversight of DRMS pursuant to the federal Surface Mining <br />Control and Reclamation Act, engaged in a technical review of PR6 and found <br />significant deficiencies in the conclusions reached by DRMS and the Board— <br />including specific findings that aspects of PR6 do not comply with the state <br />regulatory program. Those defects resulted in an order that WFC engaged in a soil <br />sampling and analysis program, which was implemented in late 2011. <br />The Morgans do not disagree with parts of PR6, specifically the designation <br />of all of the Morgan Property as containing prime farmland soils. Nor do they <br />object to the post mining land use standard for the Morgan Property being irrigated <br />cropland. They do object to a number of points in the plan, as set forth below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.