My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-03-22_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2013-03-22_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:18:46 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:52:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/22/2013
Doc Name
Answer Brief of Western Fuels Colorado 2010 CV548
From
Christopher Kamper, Stewart McNab Carver, Schwarz Mc Nab & Baily, LLC
To
District Court, Montrose County Colorado
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />TABLEOF CONTENTS ........................................................... ............................... ii <br />STATEMENT OF ISSUES ......................................................... ..............................1 <br />STATEMENTOF THE CASE .................................................... ..............................1 <br />I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ......................... ..............................3 <br />II. STATEMENT OF FACTS ...................................... ..............................4 <br />SUMMARYOF ARGUMENT ................................................. ..............................1 I <br />STANDARDOF REVIEW ........................................................ .............................12 <br />ARGUMENT.............................................................................. .............................13 <br />I. THE COURT MAY NOT CONSIDER EVIDENCE NOT <br />BEFORE THE BOARD AT THE TIME OF THE DECISION .........13 <br />A. Post - Decision Evidence May Not Be Considered .................... 14 <br />B. The Board's Exclusion of the `Midnight Letters' from <br />NRCSWas Proper ....................................... .............................15 <br />II. THE BOARD'S APPROVAL OF PR -6 WAS A PROPER <br />RESPONSE TO THE PRE -2008 TOPSOIL MANAGEMENT OF <br />WESTERN FUELS - COLORADO ........................ .............................17 <br />A. The Board Properly Ruled that It Lacked Jurisdiction to <br />Consider Allegations that Western Fuels- Colorado Was in <br />Violation of the Act ..................................... .............................18 <br />B. The Colorado Coal Program Allows a Permit Revision that <br />Addresses the Effect of a Mutual Mistake in Prior <br />Permitting..................................................... .............................24 <br />III. THE BOARD'S DECISION TO APPROVE PR -6 SHOULD BE <br />TREATED WITH DEFERENCE BY THE COURT BECAUSE <br />IT IS SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ON THE <br />RECORD AS A WHOLE AND CARRIES A PRESUMPTION <br />OFVALIDITY ....................................................... .............................27 <br />A. The Suitability of Bench 1 Material as Subsoil is Supported <br />by Substantial Evidence ............................... .............................28 <br />00145923 2 1 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.