Laserfiche WebLink
41 1 <br />Berry, David <br />From: <br />Berry, David <br />Sent: <br />Friday, June 04, 2010 12:06 PM <br />To: <br />Lance Wade <br />Subject: <br />RE: <br />Lance - Thank you. I understand the challange, and I appreciate your taking another run at it. I suspect that the most <br />direct possibility for resolution resides with WFC and Turner. <br />Thank you again, <br />David Berry <br />From: Lance Wade [mailto:riwade @wfcnucla.org] <br />Sent: Fri 6/4/2010 11:07 AM <br />To: Berry, David <br />Subject: RE: <br />David, <br />We will do our best but it is unrealistic to believe we will reach an agreement on all issues that Ms Turner may have. <br />Lance Wade <br />From: Berry, David [maiIto:David.Berry@state.co.us] <br />Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 10:19 AM <br />To: Lance Wade <br />Subject: RE: <br />Thanks Lance - Ms. Turner is still objecting to various parts of the latest PR6 materials. We anticipate written objections <br />shortly. Given the likelihood of ongoing dispute, and the legal requirements associated with land owner coordination, I <br />recommend that WFC should meet with Ms. Turner and Mr. Morgan as soon as possible. As indicated in our latest letter, <br />we will need affirmative evidence of landowner coordination. <br />Resolution of the issues between WFC and the landowner representatives might minimize the need <br />for DRMS /Board /OSM processes. <br />Thank you for your help. <br />David Berry <br />From: Lance Wade [mailto:rlwade @wfcnucla.org] <br />Sent: Fri 6/4/2010 9:44 AM <br />To: Berry, David <br />Subject: RE: <br />David, <br />