2010-11-17_REVISION - C1981008 (3)

Home Browse Search

well aware that we do not have a fax nor do we have an e-mail, This seems a little bit one -sided and also Western Fuels attempt to decide what facts could be talked about and what facts were relevant to the case. Anything in PR -06 that is documented should be permitted. We have tried several times prior and after to contact the Attorney General Office, but are told that the ones we need to speak to are unavailable. We have been blocked from calls to the Division which was the only contact number available. We tried Western Fuels Attoney, but his office was also closed for the day. We are requesting relief in all of these issues because 90% of PR -06 involves our property. Another formal hearing has been requested and submitted with approximately 35 signatures. We will again be returning to Denver for a formal hearing because this time you have recognized JoEllen Turner and Michael Morgan as the objectors and next time we will be representing Mr. And Mrs. Morgan and proper papers have been filed with the Division at the beginning to allow JoEllen Turner and Mike Morgan to represent Frank and MaryLou Morgan at which time new evidence will be available and submitted. Michael Morgan is Frank Morgan son and will eventually have this place and I have leased it for 19 years doing the farming. We are requesting relief from the Board because this evidence has not come back from out of state soil scientist, soil analysis, etc. which cannot be presented at this time as part of the exhibits or documentation. We are again requesting relief. We are farmers, we are not attorneys and should not have to be. Our public comment period does not even end until November 15, 2010. We are being requested to furnish information and documentation that is not available at this time. This does not seem to protect our rights under the rules and regulations of the Colorado Regulatory Program. We have been given a week since were even told that the proceedings begin 30 days after the first objection was filed. This is a formal hearing. This is our right to have and should be informed of all of these rules and regulations. We are every day people living in a very small community that is 2 hours from anywhere and as farmers, we should not be treated as attorneys. We should, however, be given equal rights as citizens and as individuals to present to the Board whatever materials and evidence that we have that pertains to this Permit Revision that directly affects our property. If we are refused an extension, then materials will be faxed to the Division or the Attorney Generals office before close of business on Monday, however, they will not be three hole punched since faxes do not do that, but we are not going to be disallowed just because that reason. The time frames that are being requested of us is unjust and we are again requesting relief and assistance here. The Colorado Regulatory program is suppose to protect us and our rights, instead they are helping and assisting the Operator and we are being left out. We will fax all of this on Monday the8th, 2010 and we are showing good cause for an extension. We are farmers, not attorneys and this should not be treated a judicial review but as a formal hearing allowing us to submit our evidence. Thank you for all of your time. Thank you for your time, Respectfully submitted on Sunday 7`h of November, 2010. We are faxing this, but would require an immediate answer as Monday is the 8'. (970- 864 -7682 or 970 - 739 -1753, Or970- 739 -1707. 44