My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-17_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-11-17_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:04 PM
Creation date
2/12/2014 9:01:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/17/2010
Doc Name
Transcript MLRB Hearing
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DIH
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br />7 <br />i <br />J <br />7 <br />7 <br />II <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />44 <br />MR. AMICK: You said you hired an <br />independent survey in 1999. <br />MR. LEWICKI: That's right. <br />MR. AMICK: Then 2008 the NRCS did <br />the soil survey? <br />MR. LEWICKI: Well, they didn't do <br />the soil survey. They did a re- evaluation of the <br />prime farmland. <br />MR. AMICK: Okay. And they came up <br />in 2008 with 8.4? <br />MR. LEWICKI: No. What they said <br />was, the document that was used to determine the pH <br />in 1999 had a typo in it. So in other words, they <br />said that the use of the document was correct. The <br />document was the Important Colorado Farmland <br />Inventory, and in that document it said that the pH <br />couldn't be above 7.4. <br />MR. AMICK: Okay. <br />MR. LEWICKI: And in 2008 when they <br />re- evaluated that, they said that was typo in that <br />document. The soil survey was done right, and the <br />conclusion reached was correct, but we now know that <br />that document is wrong, and we are going to <br />reclassify the Morgan property as prime farmland. <br />MR. AMICK: To me that doesn't quite <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.