Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />34 <br />MS. TURNER: I'm sorry. I just have <br />one question. We were instructed that the only <br />thing we were permitted to talk about is absolute <br />things that deal with PR 06. None of this relates <br />to PR 06. <br />MR. KAMPER: It's just background <br />information, Mr. Chairman. <br />MR. PAULIN: Thank you. <br />MR. KAMPER: Thank you. <br />MR. LEWICKI: My name is Greg <br />Lewicki. I'm a mining and reclamation engineer <br />that's been working with the division for 30 years <br />now, and I started working on this project in the <br />late 1990s with the revision to add the lands west <br />of 2700 Road to the mine permit. <br />And the issues that we are covering <br />based on the prehearing conference, the number one <br />issue was the postmining land use, which has been a <br />subject of the formal protests. <br />Part of what you're going to hear <br />today is that some of the land was not put back to <br />irrigation that was irrigated before. <br />As part of PR 6, the division <br />requested that we go through the water availability <br />for each parcel west of 2700 Road, and using the <br />