My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-17_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-11-17_REVISION - C1981008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:04 PM
Creation date
2/12/2014 9:01:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/17/2010
Doc Name
Transcript MLRB Hearing
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
DIH
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
G <br />v <br />7 <br />J <br />7 <br />J <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />15 <br />MS. ALLISON: Mr. Chairman. <br />MR. PAULIN: Yes. <br />MS. ALLISON: I'm looking at the <br />package that was received by the division on the <br />15th, and it has a letter that was faxed to the <br />division, I believe, on November 5. <br />The letter to the members of the <br />board says, "This is a signature page that <br />acknowledges all the contents within this notebook. <br />The contents of this notebook is a formal objection <br />to the approval of Permit Revision Number 6 (PR <br />06) ." <br />And that paragraph concludes, "All <br />persons signing this formal objection are well aware <br />of the contents of this notebook and have read or <br />seen this documentation." And then there's -- it <br />goes on for another page, and there are a bunch of <br />signatures. <br />This, however, is different -- <br />there's no handwriting at the top. This is <br />different from the ones that was faxed to the <br />division on November 5. That one is the exact same <br />letter to the members of the board. <br />Like I said, it's exactly the same. <br />It has the same signatures, but this one that was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.