My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-11_REPORT - C1981041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2014-02-11_REPORT - C1981041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 12:53:06 PM
Creation date
2/11/2014 12:24:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/11/2014
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2013
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
MPB
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 SAMPLING METHODS <br />2.1 Sam& Layout <br />The sample layout protocol for the revegetation evaluation is a procedure designed to better <br />account for the heterogeneous expression of the multiple seedlings within the various reclaimed areas <br />while precluding bias in the sample site selection process. By design, the procedure is initiated randomly, <br />and thereafter, samples are identified in a systematic manner, along grid coordinates spaced at fixed <br />intervals, e.g. 100 ft. (Exhibit 1 and Maps 2 - 4). In this manner, "representation" from across the entire <br />reclaimed area is "forced" rather than risking the chance that significant pockets (or seedings) are <br />entirely missed or overemphasized as often occurs with simple random sampling. Sample site selection <br />within the reference area occurred in a similar manner, although the grid dimensions were altered <br />accordingly to accommodate the different size of area. <br />The actual procedure for sample site location occurred as follows. First, a fixed point of reference <br />locatable from year to year was selected. Second, a systematic grid of appropriate dimensions (e.g., <br />45ft. X 45 ft.) was selected to provide approximately ten coordinate intersections within each sampling <br />unit (20 for reference areas), which could then be used for sample sites. Third, a scaled, computer <br />generated representation of the selected grid was overlain on a computer generated map of the area <br />utilizing north -south and east -west compass points which could be easily established in the field. Initial <br />placement of the grid was controlled by the fourth step, selection of a pair of random numbers (between <br />0 and 100) used to facilitate location of the initial coordinate point from the fixed reference location. <br />Fifth, using a Garmin GPS handheld receiver, all sample points were located in the field. <br />Once a selected grid point was located in the field, ground cover sampling transects were always <br />oriented in the direction of the next site to be physically sampled to further limit any potential bias while <br />facilitating sampling efficiency. This orientation protocol follows that which is indicated on Exhibit 1. <br />Depending on logistics, timing, and access points to the target sampling area, the field crew would <br />occasionally layout a set of points along coordinates in one direction and then sample them in reverse <br />order. However, orientation protocol was always maintained (i.e. in the direction of the next point to be <br />physically sampled). If the boundary of an area was encountered before reaching the full length of a <br />transect, the orientation of the transect was turned 900 in the appropriate direction so the transect could <br />be completed within the target unit. In this manner, boundary samples were retained entirely within the <br />target unit by "bouncing" off the boundaries. <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. Page 7 Snowcap - Revegetation Evaluation - 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.