Laserfiche WebLink
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Mill Site Earthworks Project <br />Final Report <br />Quality Assurance Monitoring & Test Results <br />January 31, 2014 <br />ameO <br />geotextile overlap was adequate, and a minimum of 6 inches of SSF placed on the top <br />of the geotextile. <br />4.2.3 Overburden /Structural Fill (OVF) <br />AMEC monitored the excavation and placement of OVF materials required to achieve <br />the design grading for the project components. During placement field nuclear density <br />testing was performed to ensure proper compaction was achieved. OVF material <br />containing more than 30 percent by weight larger than 3/4 -inch particle size was placed <br />by method specification (per Specification 02200.0 Section 3.06). <br />AMEC verified that the OVF maximum particle size for fill did not exceed 24 inches, <br />and lifts were no thicker than 1 -'/2 times the maximum particle size. There were four <br />record tests containing materials larger than 24 inches; these tests were accepted by <br />the Project Manager due to the small amounts. However, when the out of specification <br />material was discovered, Ames was notified and the screening process evaluated and <br />the materials were brought back within Project Specifications. When OVF was placed <br />for slope reduction, AMEC verified that Ames scarified in situ materials prior to fill <br />placement and that Ames made a minimum of four passes with the smooth drum <br />vibratory compactor. <br />4.2.4 Soil Liner Fill <br />Construction of the soil liner fill consisted of hauling, placing, and compaction of Soil <br />Liner Fill material where it was to be covered with geomembrane materials and any <br />other required locations. <br />Field Monitoring <br />AMEC observed SLF placement to verify lift thickness, adequate compaction, <br />acceptable moisture content, final compacted thickness, and suitability for <br />geomembrane deployment. Angular particles, ruts, and /or desiccation cracks on the <br />finished surface were brought to the attention of Ames for repair. Ames addressed all <br />deficient areas by placing additional SLF material and re- compacting the final surface <br />prior to geomembrane placement. A final visual inspection of the prepared SLF <br />surface was conducted by AMEC and Lone Star. Both parties approved the final SLF <br />surface prior to geomembrane deployment. <br />Moisture Density Test Results <br />AMEC performed a total of 120 in -place moisture density tests of SLF. The field <br />nuclear gauge moisture density tests were required to meet a minimum 95 percent <br />compaction of the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content calculated <br />during laboratory testing of the SLF material. The Standard Proctor maximum dry <br />density and optimum moisture content values for samples containing more than ten <br />percent + 3/4 -inch material were corrected according to ASTM D4718 to facilitate direct <br />18 <br />