Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit G — Water Infonnation, Second Adequacy Review <br />Page 2 <br />February 6, 2014 <br />c. The response text references Plates A and B in Attachment C. Only plates 1 and <br />2 were found in Attachment C. Please confirm "Plates A and B" are intended to <br />be Plates 1 and 2, or provide Plates A and B. <br />d. Attachment C, Plate 2. There are groundwater contours labeled on Plate 2 <br />showing water elevations as high as 4629 inside the barrier. This is again based <br />on the drawing "Floodway and Erosion Mitigation Map, revised 1/7/14 ", 14 feet <br />above grade. Please explain this apparent anomaly. <br />Coulson Gravel Pit Mine Berm Failure Analysis and Flood Control Mitigation Plan dated <br />September 2, 2013 and prepared by Flow Technologies LLC: <br />3. Section 3.2.1, p. 13: The response to this comment is adequate. <br />4. Windam B Model Inpitt /Output Data, p. 44: The response to this comment is adequate. <br />5. Windam B Model Input /Output Data, p. 55: The response to this comment is adequate. <br />Drawings <br />6. Drawing I of I Floodway and Erosion Mitigation Map: <br />adequate. <br />7. Drawing 1 of 1 Riprap Typical Section and Profile: <br />adequate. <br />The response to this comment is <br />The response to this comment is <br />m: \min \tc1 \minerals support\m - 2013 -064 Coulson\ watercomments- 2_mem06feb14.docx <br />