My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-02-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-02-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:47 PM
Creation date
2/7/2014 11:06:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/7/2014
Doc Name
Coulter Filing (Emailed)
From
Peter Coulter
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conservator, 27 police reports stated Mrs. Coulter believed "neighbors were coming through <br />the keyhole of her front door, molesting her cat, and stealing her food." She was not capable of <br />knowing what she was signing yet Justice Munsinger was not interested in the truth. I believe <br />he had /has some personal bias against me and /or he was /is protecting JoAnne Goddard and <br />John Berman from their criminal acts. <br />At one point during the Conservatorship, the Court ORDERED (I believe it was by <br />mistake now.) the Conservator and her attorney to provide detailed conservator documents (as <br />required by Statute and Directive) where in the end, Mr. Berman produced only mundane hair <br />dresser receipts. I requested a hearing for contempt. While the hearing was held, Justice <br />Munsinger never addressed the issue and couldn't get off the bench fast enough. The end <br />result was /is that there has never been a detailed valid accounting of my Mother's estate even <br />though there were statutory rules, Supreme Court Directives, Statutory requirements and a <br />plethora of Motions and Orders to provide such. <br />The end result was Justice Munsinger closing the Conservator case without one accurate <br />detailed report and refusal to have the reports Audited. But it didn't end here. My Mother <br />passed away on January 6, 2013 and on January 15, 2013, Mr. Berman emailed me and <br />indicated that he was going to have my Father, Leland M. Coulter, Esq. dug up from his grave of <br />22 years and moved. I objected vehemently but it was of no use. Mr. Berman filed a bogus <br />emergency Motion citing incorrect statutes and within 24 hours the Court granted the Motion. <br />Justice Munsinger granted this despite having no jurisdiction over my Father's remains, no <br />notice to any of the parties involved and no hearing. To me that is no different than grave <br />robbers digging up his remains; only he used a black robe and gavel. Judge Munsinger <br />conspired and participated in criminal desecration of a venerated object. <br />I appealed the Conservatorship case in timely fashion and submitted a Designation of <br />Record including a transcript of the June 7, 2012 Contempt hearing. I received a call from the <br />Court Reporter saying that recording had disappeared. I didn't /don't believe it was a mistake. I <br />believe Justice Munsinger intentionally erased /deleted the tapes to cover his tracks of collusion <br />with Mr. Berman and the Conservator. I requested an investigation by the appellate Court <br />which was denied by an anonymous person who also refused to restore the record in <br />accordance with Probate statutes. The documents I received from the appellate court were so <br />bizarre, I didn't know if they were real. There were no signatures and no certificate of service. [I <br />asked three separate attorneys if they had ever seen anything like that and they indicated they <br />had not.] Only the initials JB /sa which the Court refused to tell me who those belonged to; only <br />that it was a staff attorney, not a Judge. I had to file an open records request with the Supreme <br />Court to find out the "JB" stood for Jane Bailey, Esq., a staff attorney, not a Judge. I filed a <br />Motion to reconsider and clarify and to date have not heard back from the Court. <br />I hope it is as obvious to you as it is to me that the Chief Justice's Court directives, <br />Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, and Colorado Revised Statutes were intentionally violated by <br />Chief Justice Mussinger. And further, that he has committed the criminal act of desecration of a <br />venerated object, my Father's remains. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.