My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-30_REPORT - M1973021
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1973021
>
2014-01-30_REPORT - M1973021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 12:54:51 PM
Creation date
2/3/2014 11:47:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973021
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/30/2014
From
Jeremy Deuto
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2013
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Fee/Report
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was typically very wide. The persistence of the joints was also widely variable but <br />was typically low. Apertures of the joints were moderately open to tight with <br />slightly rough to rough faces and were slightly weathered. <br />Small blocks may form in this area due to the orientation of the highwall and joint sets of the <br />rock. In addition, due to the fractured nature of the rock and highwall weathering, raveling of <br />small to medium sized rocks can also be expected. These rocks resulting from block <br />formation and raveling are anticipated to be limited in size, and should be retained on the <br />bench below the highwall and only cause local operational delays. <br />Sta. 0 +80 to 1 +70 trended 045 (north 45 degrees east). This section of the highwall <br />was not mappable due to overburden, mine waste, and/or rockfall obscuring the <br />wall. However, it is assumed the highwall conditions are similar to adjacent <br />observable /mappable sections. <br />Sta. 1 +70 to 2 +30 consisted of primarily of granitic rock with localized gnessic <br />pockets. Rocks observed within the highwall typically exhibited high compressive <br />strength (estimated) and poor quality RQD. The trend of the highwall was 045 <br />(north 45 degrees east). Two primary joint sets were evident. The first set exhibited <br />a strike ranging from 210 degrees to 225 degrees with dips ranging from 70 to 85 <br />degrees. The spacing between of these joints varied, but was typically close to <br />moderate. The persistence of the joints was also widely variable, but ranged from <br />medium to high. Apertures of the joints were tight to moderately open with slightly <br />rough to rough surfaces and were moderately weathered. The second primary joint <br />set exhibited a strike ranging from 110 degrees to 280 degrees with dips ranging <br />from 50 degrees to 85 degrees. This joint set had similar properties to primary joint <br />set 1— high rock strength, poor quality RQD, wide to moderately spaced joints, <br />medium to high persistence, tight to open joint apertures, and slightly rough to <br />rough rock surfaces with moderate weathering. <br />One secondary joint set was present within the 7470 highwall from Sta. 1 +70 to <br />2 +30. The joint set exhibited a strike ranging from 20 degrees to 30 degrees with <br />dips of approximately 15 degrees. The spacing between of these joints varied, but <br />was typically wide. The persistence of the joints was also widely variable but was <br />typically low to medium. Apertures of the joints were moderately open to tight <br />with slightly rough to rough faces and were moderately weathered. <br />Small blocks may form in this area due to the orientation of the highwall and joint sets of the <br />rock. In addition, due to the fractured nature of the rock and highwall weathering, raveling of <br />small to medium sized rocks can also be expected. These rocks resulting from block <br />formation and raveling are anticipated to be limited in size, and should be retained on the <br />bench below the highwall and only cause local operational delays. <br />A photo documentary of Bench 7470 is presented in Figure 6. <br />GEI Consultants, Inc. 9 January 2014 <br />2013 Morrison Quarry Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.