My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-31_REPORT - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2014-01-31_REPORT - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:27 PM
Creation date
1/31/2014 10:55:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/31/2014
Doc Name
29th Annual Hydrology Report (October 2012 Through September 2013)
From
Blue Mountain Energy
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2013
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
ZTT
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BME started the whole effluent toxicity (WET) testing program beginning in the fourth <br />quarter of 1989. The mine water effluent was found to be toxic to the test species. <br />Accelerated testing was conducted but the toxicity to the species continued. <br />In a meeting with Colorado Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) staff on January 31, <br />1992, the BME staff reiterated the biomonitoring events, and various measures taken to <br />identify the toxicants and to reduce the toxicity. BME took the following steps to identify <br />potential toxicants. <br />In the early stages of WET testing, the associated H2S in the effluent was <br />deemed to be a potential toxicant. However, a WET testing done by <br />ENSR Consulting in June 1990 after removing H2S by aeration still <br />showed toxicity. This result indicated that some other factor(s) also <br />contributed to the toxicity. <br />• In September, 1990, ENSR Consulting was directed to conduct a "toxicity <br />characterization" study to identify the primary cause of the toxicity. This <br />study considered pH effects, volatile organic carbon, metals chelation, <br />aeration, total dissolved solids (TDS) and ammonia. The lab determined <br />high TDS (chlorides) as the primary cause of the toxicity. However, a <br />recent review shows no correlation between LC50 values and chloride or <br />TDS levels. <br />BME took the following measures to reduce toxicity of the effluent. <br />• On -site aeration structures were installed for H2S removal before <br />discharging the effluent. <br />• A pilot test was conducted to identify a flocculent for removing high levels <br />of oil and grease from the effluent. <br />• The main water source of the mine was changed from the high TDS( >5000 <br />ppm) alluvial well water to a significantly lower TDS (500 ppm) surface <br />lagoon. <br />• The raw water tank was thoroughly cleaned and disinfected to remove <br />sludge built up over years. This sludge was found to contain significantly <br />high levels (1000 colonies /ml) of bacteria. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.