My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-30_REPORT - C1981019 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2014-01-30_REPORT - C1981019 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:25 PM
Creation date
1/31/2014 8:52:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/30/2014
Doc Name
Review of 2012 Annual Hydrology Report
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company
Annual Report Year
2012
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832 -8106 <br />January 30, 2014 <br />Chris Gilbreath <br />Colowyo Coal Company L.P. <br />100 West 116th Avenue <br />Westminster, CO 80234 <br />Re: Colowyo Coal Company, Permit No. C -81 -019 <br />Review of 2012 Annual Hydrology Report (AHR) <br />Dear Mr. Gilbreath: <br />COLORADO <br />ID IV I S I O N O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />John W. Hickenlooper <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Executive Director <br />Loretta E. Pineda <br />Director <br />I have reviewed Colowyo's responses to my review of your 2012 Annual Hydrology Report. <br />No further responses from Colowyo are necessary. I look forward to the 2013 AHR (and <br />other future AHRs) with the improvements that were discussed in this review process. In <br />particular, I look forward to Colowyo's interpretation of the hydrologic data. <br />One important aspect of the data interpretation is an analysis of trends (see DRMS Item 2). <br />Related to the data trend discussions, I would like to address Colowyo's response to DRMS <br />Item 7. It was not my intent for Colowyo to discontinue reporting all of the information in <br />the tables in pages 2 -3 to 2 -7, only the trend information that is not backed by the statistical <br />analysis. I recommend that you continue to include these tables, but trends that are not <br />defensible with statistics (i.e., relatively low R2 values) should be removed or the word <br />"increasing" (or "decreasing ") replaced with "uncertain" or something similar. <br />Let me know if you have any comments and /or questions (ext. 8113, rob.zuber @state.co.us). <br />Sincerely, <br />a/-� --,-7 Z,4, <br />Robert D. Zuber, P.E. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.