Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Wayne I. Schieldt Page 2 of 7 <br />June 21, 2012 <br />according to the standards of the Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety ( "DRMS "). <br />According to the information provided, DRMS requires that a sediment control pond be built at each <br />point where surface water leaves the mining permit boundary. These ponds capture and control the <br />water for a specific period of time to allow the sediment to settle. Consumptive use of water at the NHM <br />consists of evaporation, dust suppression, and indoor and outdoor water use at the mine offices. You <br />indicated that there are currently eight sedimentation ponds that have depletions from evaporation. <br />Mining at the NHM area will require construction of three additional ponds. Two of the ponds <br />designated as Ponds 7 and 12 will expose groundwater. <br />For the purpose of this SWSP, you have proposed to replace the net evaporation from the on- <br />channel ponds and replace the gross evaporation from the off - channel ponds. The unit evaporation <br />rate per acre for both the on- channel and off - channel ponds is outlined in the attached Tables 10 and <br />11. Computation of the unit evaporation rate under this SWSP was reduced during the ice covered <br />period. You have assumed the ice covered period to occur during the months of January and <br />December, based on the average temperatures of 26.3 °F for January and 28 °F for December; using <br />the averages from the Norwood and Uravan weather stations. However, for the purpose of this <br />SWSP, the Applicant shall replace the net/gross evaporation depletions from the exposed ground <br />water surface area that may occur during the assumed ice covered period (the months of January and <br />December) for any time that the ponds are not completely covered by ice. <br />The surface area and the associated evaporation amounts for each of the ponds are identified <br />in the attached Table 12. Table 12 also shows the drainage location for each pond so replacement <br />can be made to the right drainage in the event of a senior call on those tributaries. Based on the <br />movement of the mining area within the NHM, the maximum evaporation is estimated to occur <br />between 2014 through 2018. Thus the maximum evaporation for this period is estimated at 39.64 <br />acre - feetlyr. <br />Dust suppression is the main industrial use of water at the mine which is considered 100% <br />consumptive. Western Fuels indicated the dust suppression amount for future mining of NMH will <br />most likely be similar to the amounts that have occurred since 1998. The attached Table 9 shows the <br />minimum, maximum, and average monthly amounts of dust suppression from 1998 to 2008. The <br />average dust suppression amount for this period is identified as 38.44 acre - feetlyr. <br />The indoor and outdoor water needs for the office and maintenance facilities have been <br />supplied by the Town of Nucla, however with the movement of the mining area to the NHNM area and <br />the Cyprus Mine area, the indoor and outdoor water supply will be from a well or a series of wells that <br />are identified in the water court application in case no. 2010CW208. You assumed that future potable <br />water use from the wells will be the same as the potable water use provided by the Town of Nucla. <br />Total potable water requirements at the NHM were estimated to be 0.61 acre -feet per year (0.40 <br />acre -feet for indoor use and 0.21 acre -feet for irrigation use). The total potable consumptive use was <br />estimated to be 0.22 acre -feet per year (0.06 acre -feet from indoor use and 0.17 acre -feet from <br />irrigation use). The lagged effect of these wells is shown on the attached Table 13. The wells used for <br />indoor and outdoor purposes will be pumping from the Brushy Basin Formation, which is below the <br />coal seam. According to an analysis impacts report prepared by Mr. Christopher Sanchez of Bishop - <br />Brogden Associates, Inc. ( "BBA "), the potential point of impact for the NHNM area will be Tuttle Draw, <br />which is below the Holder and Charlie Rice Ditches, but above the R &H Development Ditch and for <br />the Cyprus area, the lagged effect from well pumping would impact Calamity Draw above the <br />Richards Waste Ditch. The Integrated Decision Support System Alluvial Water Accounting ( "IDS <br />AWAS ") stream depletion model was used to determine the lagged depletions of these wells to Tuttle <br />Draw and Calamity Draw. The aquifer characteristics used in the model for both the NHNM area and <br />