Laserfiche WebLink
• Although the xatar levels at xells HGOALS and HGDAL2 ahox little seasonality, same of the <br />chemical parameters do. At xell H®AL1, bicarbonate (HCO3) , calcium (Ca) , and 30, values <br />generally increased slightly £rom spring to £all. Prior to 1993, total concentrations of B <br />and Dot and Ammonium (Ntt~) generally ahoxad concentration increases from spring to fall xhila <br />Mg generally displayed a two to three factor increase; nitrate (N03) and total Se levels <br />generally declined from spring to fall. Since 1993, trace metal diaeolved concentrations, <br />with the exception of Fe and Mn xere generally near the loxer detection limit. <br />In samples collected prior to 1993 from wall H(~AL2, total B concentrations generally <br />increased by a factor of two to four from spring to fall, while HCOa generally increased by <br />a Factor of two to three, Ca concentrations generally increased by a Pactor o£ two, and <br />total Nn generally by a Factor o£ three betxean spring and fall. Ng, Na, and 30. levels <br />ahox increases of up to a factor of 10 from spring to fall. NEi~ concentrations ahox slight <br />increases while NOS values ahox alight deereases from spring to fall. From 1993 through <br />1995, Na and diaeolved Mn appear to ba the only constituents which display seasonality, with <br />slight concentration increases from spring to fall. <br />At well HGDAL3, seasonality trends era generally not apparent with the exception of Ca which . <br />ahoxa a alight decrease in concentration From spring to Fall and H, Mn, and NO3 which <br />display an increase in concentration values from spring to fall. <br />A comparison of ground rater data collected from June 1994 through October 1995 at wells <br />• HGDALl, AGDAL2, and HGDAL3 ie presented in Table 7-4. TD9, 90., Na, and chloride (Cl) <br />levels generally ahox a prograesiva drop from upgradiant roll HGDALI to do.mgradient well <br />HGOAL3. Tha high concentrations of Na and C1 at wells HGDALI and HGDAL2 strongly suggest <br />these portions of the Dry Creak alluvium are being in£luanced by upgradient irrigation <br />return Flow and dryland farming/Lexis shale seepage. Hecauae o£ the concern with where <br />wells HGDALI and HGDAL2 were completed, and the similarity of water quality betxean HGDAL2 <br />and HGDAL3, monitoring at walls HGDALI and HGDAL2 ceased following the October 1995 sampling <br />avant. Since October 1995, ground water sampling has only occurred at well HGDAL3. The <br />ground water data indicate that there are no long-term increasing trands evident for any <br />chemical parameter monitored at the HGT monitoring wells. <br />Trilinear diagram plots for the three alluvial walls are shown on Figures 7-1 through 7-3 <br />and Schoeller plots oP the major ions and TD9 era shorn on Figures 7-4 through 7-6. As H-G <br />Coal Company did not analyze Por potassium (R) and C1 concentrations, the concentrations of <br />K and Cl for all pre-1993 samples were estimated using IDaq/1 percentages determined From the <br />averaged Juno 1993 through October 1995 analyses which did include Rand C1 concentrations. <br />The cation points Por HGDALS and HGDAL2 ahox soma acattar; however, there is no trend to <br />the scatter. Tha Schoeller plot for H®AL1 indicates the June 15, 1990 Na value may be <br />erroneous and the 9choeller plot for HGDAL2 suggests the Nay 12, 1992 Na value and the <br />August 13, 1990 TDS value are erroneous. Cation points for wall HGDAI.3 dose not display any <br />scatter. Historically, well HGDALI <br /> <br />RM-o~ <br />5 Revised 2/98 <br />