My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-28_REPORT - C1981028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2014-01-28_REPORT - C1981028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 8:32:43 AM
Creation date
1/28/2014 2:11:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/28/2014
Doc Name
2012 Annual Reclamation Report Review
From
DRMS
To
Coors Energy Company
Annual Report Year
2012
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
JLE
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ben Moline; CEC Page 4 of 5 <br />2012; ARR Review <br />January 22, 2014 <br />standard. If the mean cover of 1.00% attributed to cheatgrass is subtracted from the total mean vegetation cover <br />percentage, this would yield 29.60% cover. This total vegetation cover percentage is greater than 90% of the <br />revegetation success standards. Prairie sandreed was the most dominant species encountered making up 50.56% <br />relative cover. Blue grama, sideoats grama and sandbluestem were also dominant plant species. Vegetation litter <br />comprised 51.8% of the ground cover. Bare soil accounted for 17.6% of the ground cover. <br />Total herbaceous production for this area was reported to be 93.2 g /m ^2. This is greater than 90% of the <br />revegetation success standards for herbaceous production calculated by the Division. According to the report <br />100% of the production was attributed to perennial grasses. <br />Six perennial grasses, one annual grass, one succulent species and one woody plant were encountered, totaling <br />nine species. Four warm season species and three cool season species were encountered. Only three warm season <br />perennial grasses met the relative importance criteria to be counted toward species composition success. Zero <br />perennial cool season grasses met the relative importance criteria to be counted. This area did not meet the <br />revegetation success criteria for species composition for 2012. <br />Area 30; 9.68 acres <br />Total mean vegetation cover for Area 30 was 28.8 %. The total mean vegetation cover reported includes <br />cheatgrass a State listed noxious weed that cannot count toward meeting the revegetation success standard. If the <br />mean cover of 2.80% attributed to cheatgrass is subtracted from the total mean vegetation cover percentage, this <br />would yield 26.00% cover. This value does not equal or exceed the revegetation success standard reported for <br />total vegetation cover in the 2012 ARR. Also, it does not equal or exceed 90% of the success standard calculated <br />by the Division. However, the total mean vegetation cover (adjusted for cheatgrass) did pass the "standard null' <br />hypothesis approach to the t -test, which indicates the reclaimed area mean is not less than 90% of the applicable <br />success standard with ninety percent statistical confidence. This test is allowed under Rule 4.15.11(2)(b), <br />however in accordance with this Rule, 15 samples was required to be taken even though statistical sample <br />adequacy was achieved with fewer samples and only 10 samples were taken. Prairie sandreed was the most <br />dominant species encountered in this area, making up 39.52% relative cover. Indian ricegrass (Oryzopis <br />hymenoides), sand bluestem, cheatgrass, sideoats grama, western wheatgrass (Agropyron smithii) and blue grama <br />grass were also dominant species encountered at the site. Vegetative litter comprised 50.6 % ground cover. Bare <br />soil accounted for 20.6% ground cover. <br />Total herbaceous production was reported to be 124.1 9/m ^2. This is greater than 90% of the revegetation <br />success standard for herbaceous production calculated by the Division. According to the report, 99.99% of the <br />production was attributed to perennial grasses. <br />Ten graminoid species were encountered within this area. Eight of the encountered species were native and two <br />were introduced. Eight species were perennial and two were annual species. Six warm season species and four <br />cool season species were encountered. Four warm season perennial grasses met the relative importance criteria to <br />be counted toward species composition success. Two perennial cool season grasses met the relative importance <br />criteria to be counted. This area exceeded the revegetation success criteria for species composition for 2012. <br />Area 31; 11.92 acres <br />Total mean vegetation cover was reported to be 25.8 %. The total mean vegetation cover reported includes <br />cheatgrass a State listed noxious weed that cannot count toward meeting the revegetation success standard. If the <br />mean cover of 5.80% attributed to cheatgrass is subtracted from the total mean vegetation cover percentage, this <br />would yield 20.00% cover. This percentage does not equal or exceed 90% of the reported success standard; nor <br />did it meet or exceed the success standard calculated by the Division. Prairie sandreed was the most dominant <br />species encountered in this area, making up 46.2% relative cover. Cheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, western <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.