My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-22_PERMIT FILE - M2013064 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2013064
>
2014-01-22_PERMIT FILE - M2013064 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 9:48:11 AM
Creation date
1/23/2014 2:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2013064
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/22/2014
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
included as an addendum to this submittal. . As can be seen, the soil <br />stockpiles as they encompasses portions of the west and north lot line of the <br />Corral parcel, will function to further limit operational effects to the nearby <br />residence. A typical cross - section will encompass an area nearly 75 feet <br />long, at 3 feet in height with 3H:1V slopes for a total width of 21 feet. The <br />cross - sectional area is sufficient to store the necessary volume of soils <br />needed for reclamation, as detailed under part 12, below. <br />12.The Applicant proposes to replace a minimum of 6 inches of topsoil on the <br />reclaimed areas. The NRCS soils report states topsoil depths ranges from 0 <br />to 48 inch in the majority of the South and Middle Fields and the report by <br />AWES, LLC dated July 22, 2013 states three to five feet of topsoil is present <br />based on soil borings conducted on the site. Additionally, only approximately <br />10% of the mined area will require topsoil replacement due to the creation of <br />the clay lined reservoir. Therefore, the Applicant should replace topsoil to a <br />depth at least equal to the existing topsoil depth of three to five feet. Please <br />commit to replacing topsoil to a minimum depth of three to five feet over the <br />reclaimed upland areas. <br />Exhibit C -1: Existing Conditions Map, show the two predominant soils within <br />the extraction limits. Both are commonly associated along alluvial pathways <br />and floodplains along the Front Range. Middle Field is dominated by Soil Unit <br />10 - Bankard Soils, with some overlap of Soil Unit 3 - Aquoll /Aquent Soils, <br />which essentially covers the balance of South Field. The Bankard Soils have <br />a Soil Series Description. The Aquoll /Aquent Soils do not. This is an <br />important distinction, since soils lacking a soil profile description are <br />generally considered Entisols, while those with poorly formed profiles may <br />be considered Inceptisols (please refer to attached descriptions of Entisols <br />and Inceptisols). <br />Generally, topsoil is understood to be the A -1, or more generously the upper <br />A profile of a developed soil profile; and otherwise - where it exists - the Ap <br />or `plow layer' where it is either absent or in the event where it is shallower <br />than the six inch plow layer, made deeper by cultivation and assigned the Ap <br />designation. In poorly formed soils, there is no distinct soil pedon and soil <br />depths can vary dramatically every three feet or so. <br />Contrary to the American propensity that more is better, such is seldom the <br />case in soil as it increases in depth from the surface. Commonly, in all soils, <br />but especially in poorly developed soils, the deeper you go, the less organic <br />matter, the lower the fertility, and the poorer the soil texture, if any. A lack <br />Varra Companies, Inc. Coulson Resource Project OMLR M- 2013 -064 7 <br />Correspondence to Peter Hays 21 January 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.