Laserfiche WebLink
Hydraulics <br />Hydrology <br />Water Resources <br />P.O. Box 6100 <br />Breckenridge, CO 80424 <br />970 - 547 -3823 <br />www.flowtechnologies.biz <br />Plasticity Index. This parameter is mentioned in Section 3.2.1 for the purpose of giving a basic <br />description of WinDAM, but was not needed in this analysis. The plasticity index is required <br />only when a vegetative surface is being modeled. Because the erosion modeling of Coulson Pit <br />did not consider a vegetative surface — rather bare soil for conservativeness — input of plasticity <br />index was not necessary. <br />Total Unit Weight. Total unit weight is the total density of the in -place soil in the berm. A value <br />of 115 lb /ft3 was input for this analysis. <br />Total unit weight was not available from soil sample data for Coulson Pit. Due to such, the value <br />obtained from soil boring data of a nearby gravel mine (Western Sugar) was assumed applicable <br />to Coulson Pit. This is a reasonable assumption because total unit weight is not a sensitive <br />parameter with respect to final results. <br />Undrained Shear Strength. WinDAM B uses the undrained shear strength approximated by <br />taking one -half of the unconfined compressive strength of the soil material. ASTM D2166 <br />provides a description of the testing methodology to determine the unconfined compressive <br />strength of soil — which is a complex, expensive procedure and beyond the scope of practicality <br />of this study. Due to such, guidance contained in a paper authored by Hanson et el. ( 1 ) was <br />applied. Hanson's paper includes a table provided by Moore (2) for estimating unconfined <br />compressive strength of soil which was applied for estimating undrained shear strength for the <br />purpose of this analysis. <br />In addition to Moore's procedure, engineering judgment was applied. Because the WinDAM <br />methodology is not an exact science (as with any computer model of natural processes), <br />undrained shear strength values used on other WinDAM analyses (provided as references with <br />the model) were viewed and considered also. <br />Most importantly, due to the uncertainties of estimating undrained shear strength, sensitivity <br />analysis was performed and results indicate that variations within the bounds of reasonable <br />values have minimal effects on the study conclusions for the scenarios evaluated. Based on the <br />above, a value of 200 lb /ft2 was input to WinDAM. <br />Critical Shear Stress. The critical shear stress can be determined from the jet erosion test or some <br />other erosion test (e.g., flume test, hole erosion test, or erosion function apparatus). Those tests <br />would be impractical for the purpose of this study. However per the WinDAM manual, the <br />critical shear stress is usually enough smaller than the applied hydraulic shear stress that it may <br />be taken as zero with minimum error. <br />However, engineering judgment was applied to arrive at a value slightly greater than zero, or 0.1 <br />lb /ft2. It was reasoned that for the event being modeled, the berm would have a high moisture <br />content due to heavy rains preceding the flood event. Also, the berm (upper soil profile) would <br />1 Development and Characterization of Soil Material Parameters for Embankment Breach, G.J. Hanson, D.M. <br />Temple, S.L. Hunt, R.D. Tejral, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, Vol. 27(4):587 -595, 2011. <br />z Moore, J.S., Field procedures for the headcut erodibility index. Trans. ASAE (40(2): 425 -436), 1997. <br />Page 2 <br />