My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-22_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2014-01-22_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:39:09 PM
Creation date
1/22/2014 3:30:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
1/22/2014
Doc Name
Fourth Quarter, 2013 water analysis
From
Star Mine Operation
To
DRMS
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Star Mine Operations LLC <br />L16199 -05 WG357522 Silica, total <br />WG357541 Chloride <br />WG357353 Cyanide, total <br />WG357361 Cyanide, WAD <br />WG357448 Nitrate /Nitrite as N <br />WG357006 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved <br />M200.7 ICP <br />SM4500CI -E <br />M335.4 - Colorimetric w/ <br />distillation <br />M335.4 - Colorimetric w/ <br />distillation <br />SM4500 -CN I- Colorimetricw/ <br />distillation <br />M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved <br />M365.1 - Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />WG357040 Residue, Non - Filterable (TSS) @105C SM2540D <br />SM2540D <br />WG357482 Sulfate <br />REPADA 5.06.05.01 <br />D516 -02 - Turbidimetric <br />ACZ Project ID: L16199 <br />ZS Digestion procedures have the potential to trigger silica <br />polymerization and precipitation, leading to low biased <br />results. Silica chemistry is complex and polymerization <br />kinetics are unpredictable. Dissolved and/or acid soluble <br />silica analyses may provide more accurate measurements. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the recovery of the <br />associated control sample (LCS or LFB) was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />Q1 Sample integrity was not maintained. See Case Narrative. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL). <br />M3 The spike recovery value is unusable since the analyte <br />concentration in the sample is disproportionate to the spike <br />level. The recovery of the associated control sample (LCS <br />or LFB) was acceptable. <br />Page 68 of 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.