My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-14_PERMIT FILE - M1990098
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1990098
>
2014-01-14_PERMIT FILE - M1990098
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2020 5:02:48 PM
Creation date
1/15/2014 3:59:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990098
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/14/2014
Doc Name
Incomplete application for transfer of mineral permit and S.O.
From
NCC
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
TAK
BJC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
proposed mining setback was set approximately 60 feet from the existing <br />overhead poles. <br />Case West — Oil /Gas Structure (WEST). The mining operation is adjacent to <br />private property with an existing oil and gas structure. The mining depth was <br />assumed to be 26 feet in this area based on bore log information in the <br />geotechnical data. The proposed mining setback was set approximately 60 feet <br />from the existing structure. <br />The cross - sections located in Appendix B show the estimated phreatic surface <br />associated with each case as well as the geometry used in the mining. <br />METHODOLOGY <br />The mining embankment configuration shown in the computer analysis represents the <br />estimated conditions for this site. If mining conditions differ from the estimated <br />conditions, the slope stability will need to be re- evaluated on a case by case basis. The <br />Bishop Method was used in the computer analysis for determining safety factors. The <br />procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest <br />safety factor. 1000 separate failure surfaces were analyzed for each case. The required <br />minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the Colorado State <br />Engineer's Office (SEO) in evaluating embankment dams, and industry accepted <br />standards for the evaluation of temporary structures during construction. <br />SLOPE STABILITY RESULTS <br />The SEO requires minimum safety factors of 1.3 for static condition analyses and 1.0 for <br />pseudo- static (earthquake loading) condition analyses for Class I (high hazard) <br />embankment dams. This design criteria was used to establish the desired minimum <br />safety factors for this project and should be considered as highly conservative for <br />evaluating alluvial mining slopes. The calculated factors of safety are within the design <br />criteria specified for this project and can be considered indicators of the mining slope <br />performance under the various conditions. The slopes were analyzed using full and <br />empty reservoir conditions. The results of the static condition and pseudo- static <br />condition slope stability analyses in Table 2 and Table 3. <br />Northern Colorado Constructors, Inc. — Perry Pit <br />Slope Stability Analysis <br />JdtT Consulting, Inc. Pa e 3 <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.