My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-12-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018A
>
2013-12-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:37:57 PM
Creation date
1/9/2014 8:02:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/10/2013
Section_Exhibit Name
Section V. Mine Surface Facilities Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The reclaimed D Portal Area will be approximately 44 acres and the total area in Scullion Gulch <br />which drains into the White River will be 7560 acres. Thus, the reclaimed D Portal Area will be only <br />0.6% of the total area draining into the White River. Since the reclaimed area will be very small in <br />comparison to the total drainage area, the overall quality of the water reaching the White River from <br />Scullion Gulch during a runoff event will not be significantly affected. <br />An alternative to the use of contour furrowing, mulching, jute netting, and loose rock check dams <br />would be the construction of a large sediment pond across Scullion Gulch downstream from the D- <br />Portal Area. To control runoff from the reclaimed area, the pond would necessarily also control <br />runoff from the Scullion Gulch watershed above the reclaimed area (unless an elaborate diversion <br />system was constructed to bypass Scullion Gulch runoff). With a drainage area of approximately <br />5270 acres, the 10 -year, 24 -hour storm (1.6 inches) would yield about 152 acre -feet (assuming a <br />runoff curve number of 77). Thus, a sediment pond with a volume in excess of 160 acre -feet would <br />be required, resulting in a large amount of disturbance. This alternative is, therefore, not <br />considered feasible or desirable. <br />Disturbed area runoff will be controlled at the slot storage areas during final reclamation by the use <br />of surface roughening on contour. Mulching and loose rock check dams may also be used as <br />necessary to control sediment and enhance reclamation. <br />• V.0 Diversions <br />A channel diversion of Scullion Gulch was required at the "D" Portal Area to provide adequate area <br />for parking, mine entry, and surface facilities. This diversion consists of a large diameter <br />corrugated -metal pipe to bypass the main Scullion Gulch flow with smaller diameter lateral <br />corrugated -metal pipes to bypass tributary inflows in the portal area. Pipe dimensions and design <br />details are shown on Maps 29, 30, 31 and 32. Details of the pre- existing channel are shown on <br />Maps 36, 37, 38 and 39. <br />Burying the Scullion Gulch drainage through the plant area has the added advantage of decreasing <br />the possibility of airborne coal dust or spills entering the drainage. In addition, this layout has <br />significantly reduced the number and size of required sedimentation ponds. <br />The Scullion Gulch bypass system has been designed to safely pass the peak flows resulting from <br />the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event. Peak flows were determined using NRCS methods as <br />described in TP -149 (for watersheds with drainage areas of 2,000 acres or less) and Section 4 of <br />the National Engineering Handbook (for larger watersheds). Map 21 shows the drainage basins of <br />concern. Runoff calculations are included in Illustration 9. <br />The bypass system was sized using the conservation of energy principle (Bernoulli's equation) to <br />construct backwater curves along the culvert. Peak flows in the main and tributary channels were <br />assumed to reach the culvert simultaneously. Results of the backwater analysis are also included <br />• in Illustration 9. <br />Mid -Term Review 2002 (8/2002) V -15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.