My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-06_REVISION - M2000041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000041
>
2014-01-06_REVISION - M2000041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:28:46 PM
Creation date
1/7/2014 2:48:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000041
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/6/2014
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy of October 7, 2013 AM01
From
Environmental Alternatives, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Given input values of h,,,. W, Kh, and initial <br />(premining) saturated thickness above the base of the <br />mine (h = h,,), the distance of influence (x;) can be <br />calculated directly by setting x equal to xi and re- <br />arranging equation 7. Once xi is determined, h can be <br />calculated for any distance upgradient from the mine <br />wall, and drawdown can be calculated as h. — h. In <br />addition, the inflow rate per unit length of mine. Q <br />[L2/T1. can be calculated as: <br />Q = Wx; (8) <br />The analytical solution for a linear mine wall is <br />valid for ground -water flow systems that meet the <br />following assumptions: <br />• The geologic materials are homogeneous and <br />isotropic; <br />• Ground -water flow is steady state, unconfined, hori- <br />zontal, and perpendicular to the mine wall; <br />• Recharge is uniformly distributed at the water table, <br />and all recharge within the distance of influence <br />is captured by the mine; <br />• The uphill mine wall is approximated as a straight <br />line; <br />• The static premining water table is approximately <br />horizontal; and <br />• The base of the pit is coincident with the base of the <br />aquifer, and there is no flow through the mine <br />bottom. <br />MODFLOW -2000 (Harbaugh and others, 2000) <br />was used to estimate the steady -state extent of draw - <br />down near a mine and ground -water inflow to a mine <br />under conditions that consider heterogeneity, anisot- <br />ropy, and boundaries. MODFLOW -2000 solves the <br />transient ground -water flow equation by using implicit <br />finite- difference methods and is based on a three - <br />dimensional, block - centered, finite- difference grid. <br />Aquifer properties can be heterogeneous and aniso- <br />tropic provided the principal axes of hydraulic conduc- <br />tivity are aligned with the coordinate directions <br />(Harbaugh and others, 2000: McDonald and <br />Harbaugh, 1988), and aquifer layers can be simulated <br />as confined, unconfined, or a combination of both <br />(Harbaugh and others, 2000). MODFLOW -2000 can <br />simulate several types of hydrologic sources and sinks <br />including aquifer recharge, evapotranspiration, wells, <br />drains, and rivers, and it can simulate either steady - <br />state or transient conditions. <br />SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC <br />EFFECTS OF MINING AGGREGATE <br />Two hydrogeologic settings in the Colorado <br />Front Range area were simulated using analytical and <br />numerical methods. The first set of simulations used <br />conceptualizations of aggregate mining in sand -and- <br />gravel aquifers, and the second set of simulations used <br />conceptualizations of aggregate mining in fractured <br />crystalline -rock aquifers. Analytical and numerical <br />simulations were used to estimate the steady -state <br />hydrologic effects of mining. Under steady -state <br />conditions, discharge to a mine reaches equilibrium <br />with the surrounding ground -water system, and the <br />extent of drawdown caused by dewatering a mine <br />ceases to increase. Therefore, steady -state simulations <br />predict the maximum potential effects of mining over <br />time. To predict short-term effects, transient (time - <br />varying) simulations are necessary. Steady -state <br />simulations of pits in sand - and - gravel aquifers may <br />overpredict the effects of mining if active dewatering <br />of the pit ceases before steady -state conditions are <br />reached. The hydrologic effects of pits in sand -and- <br />gravel aquifers after active dewatering ceases (pits <br />lined with slurry walls or refilled pits undergoing <br />evaporative losses) likely reach steady -state conditions <br />because such pits may be left open indefinitely. The <br />hydrologic effects of quarries in fractured crystalline- <br />rock aquifers also likely reach steady -state conditions <br />because quarries commonly drain without the aid of <br />active dewatering measures (Knepper, 2002) and may <br />be left open indefinitely. Predicting the transient <br />hydrologic effects of mining is beyond the scope of <br />this report. <br />Simulation of Pits in Sand -and- <br />Gravel Aquifers <br />Definitions of input parameters for simulations <br />of aggregate mining in sand- and - gravel aquifers <br />were based on data reported in the literature <br />(see "Hydrogeologic Settings "). Definitions of mining <br />extents (area and depth) were defined based on mine <br />SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC EFFECTS OF MINING AGGREGATE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.