My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-06_REVISION - M2000041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000041
>
2014-01-06_REVISION - M2000041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:28:46 PM
Creation date
1/7/2014 2:48:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000041
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/6/2014
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy of October 7, 2013 AM01
From
Environmental Alternatives, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
geotechnical investigation, groundwater elevations in bore holes near the open pit were likely <br />influenced by dewatering. Several other factors likely influence the alluvial groundwater <br />elevations and gradients on and near the project site. The aquifer is confined on the southern <br />boundary by the Arkansas River and the alluvium pinches out approximately one -half mile north <br />of the property. Irrigation canals and ditches, agricultural wells, and irrigated lands on and <br />adjacent to the property likely provide depletions and recharge to the alluvial groundwater <br />system that create seasonal and localized fluctuations in groundwater elevations and gradients. <br />Table 2 <br />Summary of May 2006 Selected Bore Hole Gradation Data <br />Exploration <br />D10(') <br />D50(2) <br />1360 (3) <br />Uniformity <br />Sand (5> <br />Hydraulic (6) <br />Hole <br />(mm) <br />(mm) <br />(mm) <br />Coeff.(4) <br />Fraction <br />Conductivity <br />( %) <br />(feet/day) <br />THM -5 <br />9.2 <br />73 <br />9.5'- 11.0' <br />0.16 <br />0.42 <br />0.59 <br />3.7 <br />88.2 <br />80 <br />2.6 <br />94 <br />THM -5 <br />53.2 <br />477 <br />19.5' - 21.0' <br />0.41 <br />5.5 <br />11 <br />27 <br />44.1 <br />303 <br />2.7 <br />n/a <br />THM -16 <br />18.9 <br />290 <br />9.5 - 11.0' <br />0.31 <br />3.4 <br />6.5 <br />21 <br />78.8 <br />206 <br />2.3 <br />n/a <br />THM -16 <br />20.7 <br />409 <br />19.5' - 21.0' <br />0.39 <br />2.0 <br />3.0 <br />7.7 <br />76.7 <br />387 <br />2.6 <br />177 <br />39.7 <br />524 <br />Bulk Sample <br />0.43 <br />2.8 <br />4.9 <br />11.4 <br />59.9 <br />444 <br />0.4 <br />n/a <br />(1) 10% of the particles in the sample are smaller than this diameter. <br />(2) 50% of the particles in the sample are smaller than this diameter. <br />(3) 60% of the particles in the sample are smaller than this diameter. <br />(4) Uniformity Coefficient = D60/D10 <br />(5) Sample composition: gravel (top )/sand (middle) /fines (bottom) <br />(6) Method results for estimating hydraulic conductivity: Hazen Method from Fetter 1994 (top)Beyer <br />Method from Kresic 2006 (middle)/Prugh graphical method from Powers 2007 (bottom, n/a = method <br />not applicable) <br />Groundwater elevations and average estimates of the alluvial saturated thickness taken from the <br />site bore log data are consistent with values obtained from published data for the Arkansas River <br />valley. Reference material (Nelson et al. 1989 and USGS 2002) suggests that the alluvial <br />groundwater elevation across the site should be about 4514 to 4520 feet above mean sea level <br />(amsl) with annual and seasonal fluctuations of several feet and a saturated thickness ranging <br />(,blue earth Page 4 of l l <br />SOLUTIONS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.