My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-01-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2014-01-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:38:41 PM
Creation date
1/7/2014 9:15:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/5/2014
Doc Name
E-mail from Dr. Corley regarding subsidence at the mine shop
From
W D Corley
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
RDZ
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ilr/iC! <br />'1. <br />COLORADO <br />1A <br />State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Fwd: shop location <br />Hello - <br />Please file this email as follows: <br />Permit #: C- 1981 -014 <br />Class Name: General Documents <br />Doc Name: E -mail from Dr. Corley regarding subsidence at the mine shop <br />Doc Type: General Correspondence <br />Thanks, <br />Rob <br />George, John, David, and Rob, <br />We received yesterday the copy of A] Weaver's shop report dated Dec. 12, 2013, including the map titled Figure 1 Corley <br />Mine Shop Building Location Map. We have a few thoughts about this report. We believe that the shop is correctly <br />located on this new map, but we would question the assumption in the report that the maximum angle of draw is 29 <br />degrees. The angle of draw was never measured for this strata in this location. i believe that the inclusion of the 29 <br />degree amount in the permit is only an estimate or prediction for the actual angle of draw, and the actual angle of draw <br />could be different. Now after subsidence has occurred the angle of draw will never be known. <br />However, since this report map is based on the Southfield Mine Permanent Closure Map which is know to contain <br />errors such as the location of the monitoring well MW 16, and since it is impossible to check today the actual extent or the <br />elevation of the underground mining, we have located the shop on two other Southfield Mine Maps: Map 12 and Map 17. <br />These two maps utilize apolyconic projection coordinate systemwhich is different fromthe coordinate systemof the <br />Southfield Mine Permanent Closure Map. Since we could not duplicate this polyconic coordinate systemwe have had to <br />rely on georeferencing the shop location from the distances of the shop to known section and quarter corners shown on <br />Map 12. These two maps also have 5 ft. contour lines. The SE corner of the shop coincides with the 6205 ft. contour line. <br />The surveyed elevation of the SE corner of the shop is 6201.3 ft. or 3.7 ft. lower in 2013 than indicated by the 1989 <br />Southfield contour map. This would indicate that subsidence of the shop has occurred. I know of no other premining <br />elevation data that is available. <br />Doug Corley <br />https: / /mail.g oog le.conVmai I /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i Ire29129fcb5 &viev�-- pt &search =i nbox&th= 143699727688ccd2 1 /1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.