My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-12-18_REVISION - C1992080
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1992080
>
2013-12-18_REVISION - C1992080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:38:12 PM
Creation date
12/20/2013 9:35:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/18/2013
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 2
From
DRMS
To
Savage and Savage Environmental
Type & Sequence
RN4
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
outcrop soil mapping units is not recommended, as any soil retrieved will most likely be <br />lost in dilution with broken sandstone. The SCS concurs with this approach (Exhibit J). <br />The projected disturbed area and soil stockpile locations are shown on the Mine Plan <br />Map (Map 5 -2). The areas of each soil map unit, the recommended stripping depth, and <br />the total volume of available soil is shown on Table 4 -7 (Exiibitdj. Each soil stockpile <br />will be seeded with the temporary seed mix given in the reclamation plan to control <br />erosion (See Section 2.05.3(5)). <br />'Tables 5 -2 and 5 -3 have been revised to reflect the findings of the Walsh <br />Study of February 21, 1983. Map 5 -3 (Soil Stripping and Respreading) has also been <br />revised to reflect information from the same study. Incorporating the above changes, <br />Table 5 -6 was updated to reflect the appropriate information. The original soils work <br />was amended by the updated work provided in the February 21, 1983 Walsh report. <br />This report has been provided in its entirety as a part of this permit per the agreement <br />with the Division and outdated information was retained as appendices. <br />The amounts of soil salvaged from the existing disturbed and areas proposed for <br />disturbance will be sufficient to replace the projected depths of soil during reclamation. <br />No selected overburden material is proposed for use as a soil substitute during <br />reclamation. <br />Abridged Permit Document 4 -17 Feb 2013 Permit Renewal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.