Laserfiche WebLink
12/13/13 State.co.us Eacutive Branch Mail - Re: Trapper Mine; C -1981 -010; December 2013 Inspection Report <br />STATE of <br />COLORADO <br />Re: Trapper Mine; C- 1981 -010; December 2013 Inspection Report <br />Ebert - DNR, Jared <jared.ebert @state.co.us> Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:02 AM <br />To: Graham Roberts <graham @trappermine.com> <br />Cc: Alysha Hernandez - DNR <alysha.hernandez @state.co.us> <br />Graham, <br />appreciate the observations, I guess a poor night sleep in a hotel and an early morning caught up with me. <br />probably should have waited a day to proofread and send the report. You are correct No -Name 5 was <br />discharging; I am not sure why I put the word "appeared" in there. I forgot that No -Name 4 has a stand -pipe <br />primary spillway; I must have been looking at the emergency spillway and did not see any flow so I noted that it <br />was not discharging. However, from my notes and recollection the flume below East Pyeatt No. 3 was <br />discharging, I should have clarified in my report that the water was flowing from the flume. In regards to Horse <br />Gulch, I looked back at my picture and the angle is poor and I really can't tell. During the inspection the snow <br />appeared moist in the primary and emergency spillway and different from the surrounding snow. I will attempt to <br />clarify points such as this in the future. It is possible there is enough flow from the fill under drain to add from the <br />surface drainage of the area. <br />apologize for the grammar errors; there is really no excuse for that. <br />Jared <br />On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Graham Roberts <graham @trappermine.com> wrote: <br />There are also some grammar errors throughout the report. Again, not nitpicking, but I think it is <br />important the facts are straight. <br />hffps: / /mail.g oog le.conVmai I /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i Ire29129fcb5 &�iev�-- pt &search =i nboy&th= 142ed2O752ff4979 1/3 <br />