My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-12-09_REVISION - C1982056 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2013-12-09_REVISION - C1982056 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:37:55 PM
Creation date
12/10/2013 9:12:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/9/2013
Doc Name
Email Regarding Renewal Application
From
DRMS
To
Mitzelfeld William
Type & Sequence
RN6
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12/10/13 State.co.us Eecutive Branch Mail - Re: Renewal App. No. 6(RN -6) Foidel Creek Permit No. C - 1982 -056 <br />Mine permit and the Division's Rules and Regulations concerning your comments and contact you in order <br />to address your concerns. <br />look forward to talk to you soon. <br />Jason. musick @state. co. its <br />On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mitzelfeld, William <wmitzelfeld usbr.gov> wrote: <br />Jason, <br />am sorry I missed meeting you when I was at your office this afternoon. Fortunately Brock was available <br />to meet with me and was very helpful. <br />am sending this email as formal comment with regard to the referenced renewal application. <br />We believe the mine has not met it's requirement with regard to sound abatement. Sound from the mine <br />is a constant irritation. When friends come to visit, one of the first things they say is "What 's that noise ". <br />We appreciate the fact that the mine recognizes this issue. In fact several years some noise <br />measurements were taken. We are not of any follow up testing. <br />It was nice that Brock was able to help me navigate your very unfriendly web -site. <br />Unfortunately he was not able to show me how to find any records of the measurements that were taken <br />or that may have taken place sense. <br />As part of the renewal application we formally request that a condition to placed on the application to <br />require the mine to perform addition noise studies and be required to modify operation as necessary to <br />meet their permit noise guidelines. If there are no specific requirement in their permit then we believe the <br />permit should reference the State of Colorado general standards as the required standards. <br />Secondly sense June we have experience "house shakes ". At four time where we present to document <br />the time and date of the shake. Giving the mine the benefit of the doubt we checked out the possibility of <br />correlations with extremely small earthquakes. There were none. Based on discussions with geotechnical <br />engineers familiar with long wall mining it is our understanding that the shakes were most likely cause by <br />tunnel /shaft collapses during the mining operation. <br />We are asking that as a condition of the permit's renewal that mining operations be changed to prevent <br />the earth shakes that are affecting our home. <br />We look forward to receiving your response to these formal comments. <br />https: / /mai l.g oog le.conVmai 1 /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i k= e29129fcb5 &view = pt &search =i nboy&th= 142d96c646f35b87 4/5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.