Laserfiche WebLink
drainage, taking elevation and topsoil depth readings (Transect 1 in the DRMS inspection <br />report). Topsoil depth was measured by digging down until a color change in the soil was <br />encountered; this transition line was established as the bottom of the topsoil. Using a measuring <br />tape, the topsoil depth reading was taken from the bottom of this transition line to an <br />approximate ground level elevation, taking into account the slope of the ground level. The <br />measurements in Transect 1 were at 13 and 17 inches. Additional samples were taken directly <br />after (Transect 11, 12.5 and 4.5 inches). For a summary of these elevation points and topsoil <br />depth readings, please see Appendix A and page 7 of the August 15, 2013 DRMS Inspection <br />Report for this bond release application. <br />We next traveled to the F Pit, where we walked Transect 3 (Parcel F- A -10). Three topsoil depth <br />readings (11.5, 13.5, and 12.5 inches) and elevation points were taken. We then walked F -AB -9 <br />(Transect 2 topsoil depth samples were 14, 14, and 12 inches; Transect 12, topsoil samples <br />measured 16 and 23.5 inches). We found one significant erosional rill between the two topsoil <br />sampling locations in Transect 12; Jared took the location with his Trimble Yuma. Transect 10 <br />was walked for elevation samples; no topsoil samples were taken. <br />We then walked Parcel Z -A -10, dug one topsoil measurement (14.5 inches) and took several <br />elevation points along Transect 7. We then walked Transect 6 (Parcel K- A -10), which produced <br />elevation data, topsoil depth measurements (18 and 15.5 inches), bench width measurements <br />(Bench 1, 25 feet wide; top bench, 28 feet wide), and measurements of the south (18 feet) and <br />north (12 feet) drains of Horse Gulch Fill. We returned to Parcel Z -A -10 to walk Transects 8 <br />(only elevation data taken) and 9 (topsoil depth, 13 inches; elevation data also taken). Finally, <br />Transect 5 was walked within Parcel A -B -09; elevation data was recorded and 1 topsoil depth (9 <br />inches) was sampled. Within A -B -09 is the Oak Gulch Drainage, which had significant erosion <br />and sidecutting. <br />In summary, the vast majority of the 424.2 acres within this bond release application appear to <br />conform to 30 CFR, Part 906.30 and 30 U.S.C. 1269 for Phase 1 bond release. Backfilling, <br />regarding, and most of the drainage control is in accordance with its approved reclamation plan. <br />The parcels under consideration in this phase I bond release blend in with the surrounding <br />topography. Two areas of concern exist within the drainage control of Parcels A -B -09 (Oak <br />Gulch Drainage) and A -B -10 (Middle Pyett Drainage). These two drainages and a corridor <br />around them should be removed from this bond release. As mentioned earlier in this report, <br />significant erosion, including sidecutting, still exists within these drainages and should be <br />corrected. A third area will also be eliminated from this Phase I bond release; a portion of the <br />East Pyett Drainage, which is in the process of being constructed between Parcels F -A -12 and Z- <br />A-12. <br />Please address any questions concerning this report to Daniel MacKinnon, Natural Resources <br />Specialist, dmackinnon @osmre.gov or (303) 293 -5011. <br />