Laserfiche WebLink
(iA.Nisi- R I,t iJAIV h .%,ssO ci,Vrj.,.s <br />1 /rdrogeologiral and Environmental Consultants <br />Wright Water Engineering Report, Response to Comments by DMG in Adequacy <br />Review of Ft. Lupton Sand and Gravel Mine Apulication 0414999). January 3, 2005 <br />The Wright Water Engineering, Inc. (WWE) report responds to the Division of Minerals <br />and Geology (DMG)) comments related to the potential impacts of constructing a slurry <br />wall around aggregate pits operated by L.G. Everist (LGE). DMG was concerned that <br />emplacement of a slurry wall would affect surface water, groundwater, and nearby wetlands <br />along the South Platte River near Fort Lupton Colorado. <br />Response to WWE Comment #7 <br />LGE constructed a slurry wall around their aggregate mining pits in April of 2004 and <br />initiated a groundwater monitoring program to evaluate the impact to groundwater levels <br />surrounding the pits. Because this report was published so soon after (January 2005) the <br />slurry wall was completed, GL &A believes that the monitoring program had not been <br />conducted over a sufficient length of time to adequately determine the true impact to the <br />hydrologic system. The report erroneously concludes that mining operations would have <br />little or no negative effect on surface water flows and groundwater levels in the South Platte <br />River Alluvium. <br />More recent modeling studies from the USES (Arnold et al., 2010) show a mounding effect <br />where groundwater levels rise 2 to 4 feet on the north and west sides of lined pits across the <br />river from the Bachofer property. Another modeling simulation shows groundwater levels <br />rising 4 to 6 feet in the same area around the pits. Although the mounding occurs on the <br />west side of the river the impact to the landowners located on the east side of the river <br />cannot be ruled out. As stated in the U.S.G.S. report (Arnold, 2010), the South Platte acts a <br />sink to groundwater when water levels are elevated in the alluvium. Hence, mounding can <br />cause increased groundwater discharge to the river, thus contributing to higher base flows in <br />the river. As such, a lined slurry wall will not only impact groundwater levels but will also, <br />affect surface water flows in the river. <br />Earlier modeling studies were also conducted by the USGS (Arnold et al, 2003) to <br />determine the hydrologic effects of aggregate mining in hypothetical sand and gravel and <br />fractured crystalline rock aquifers. Analytical solutions and numerical models were used <br />predict the extent of steady -state drawdown and mounding due to aggregate mining below <br />the water table. The results of the model simulations are very similar to the results <br />determined by the USGS Report in 2010. That is, mounding occurs on the up- gradient side <br />of lined pits and drawdown occurs on the down- gradient side. <br />Response to WWE Comment #8 <br />WWE conducted a cumulative assessment of a lined slurry wall by using a numerical <br />groundwater model (USGS MODFLOW). The model was developed to predict <br />groundwater changes subsequent to the installation of the slurry walls around LGE's pit <br />cells. While the modeling simulations showed an increase of approximately 3 feet in <br />71 <br />