My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-11-13_HYDROLOGY - M1974069
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1974069
>
2013-11-13_HYDROLOGY - M1974069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:37:14 PM
Creation date
11/14/2013 7:16:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1974069
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
11/13/2013
Doc Name
SWSP
From
OSE
To
Bishop-Brogden Associates, Inc.
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iv. The well meter serial readings for each meter shall be included if <br />there is more than one Pieter on a well. <br />b. Each recharge site must comply with the Administration Protocol - <br />Recharge and must report the: <br />i. daily volume in AF diverted into the site; <br />ii. monthly volume in AF released from the site; <br />iii. monthly net evaporative loss in AF; <br />iv. volume of water in AF remaining at the end of the month. <br />c. The accounting must identify each source of fully consumable <br />replacement water actually delivered to the location impacted by the <br />depletions. To demonstrate the water was actually delivered to the <br />required location will require the following information: <br />i. the originating source of the water, date released and volume of <br />water released; <br />transportation losses to point of diversion or use, if any, using <br />stream loss factors approved by the water commissioner; <br />iii, the volume of water actually delivered on a daily basis past any <br />surface water diversion that was sweeping the river as <br />corroborated by the water commissioner. <br />(See Administration Protocol — Delivery of Water for more details <br />on delivering water.) <br />d. For each source of replacement water that has been "changed" for <br />use as a source of augmentation, such as changed reservoir shares, <br />ditch bypass credits or credits from dry-up, etc., the following input <br />information must be reported: <br />i. the basis and volume of the return flow obligation; <br />ii. the location the changed water was historically used; this will be <br />the location used to determine the timing of the return flow impact <br />on the river. <br />4. The accounting must include a monthly projection of the plan's operation at <br />least through March 31 of the next calendar year. <br />5. The accounting must include all input and output files associated with modeling <br />the delayed impact of diversions. The output from the modeling must report to <br />a summary table that shows, by month, the ongoing depletions associated with <br />pumping, return flow obligations, etc. and accretions from recharge operations. <br />6. A net impact summary must show the out -of- priority depletions, accretions from <br />each recharge site, volume of replacement water actually delivered to the <br />location of the depletions and the resultant net impact on a daily basis. If <br />necessary, the net impact must be done by river reach. <br />While modeling may use a monthly step function to determine the depletions <br />from pumping and accretions from recharge, the monthly result must then be <br />divided by the number of days in the month in order to simulate a daily <br />impact, as water rights are administered on a daily and not monthly basis. <br />Administration Protocol - Augmentation Plan Accounting <br />Revised March 19, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.