Laserfiche WebLink
VIII. DISCUSSION <br />C.R.C.P. Rule 60, Relief from a Judgment or Order provides: <br />(a). Clerical Mistakes. Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders, or other parts of the <br />record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the <br />court at any time of its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such <br />notice, if any, as the court orders. During the pendency of an appeal such mistakes may <br />be so corrected before the case is docketed in the appellate court, and thereafter while <br />the appeal is pending may be so corrected with leave of the appellate court. <br />(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Surprise; Excusable Neglect; Fraud; etc. On motion <br />and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal <br />representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) <br />Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) fraud (whether heretofore <br />denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of <br />an adverse party; (3) the judgment is void; (4) the judgment has been satisfied, <br />released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or <br />otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have <br />prospective application; or (5) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of <br />the judgment. The motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1) <br />and (2) not more than six months after the judgment, order, or proceeding was entered <br />or taken. A motion under this section (b) does not affect the finality of a judgment or <br />suspend its operation. This Rule does not limit the power of a court: (1) To <br />entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or <br />proceeding, or (2) to set aside a judgment for fraud upon the court; or (3) when, <br />for any cause, the summons in an action has not been personally served within or <br />without the state on the defendant, to allow, on such terms as may be just, such <br />defendant, or his legal representatives, at any time within six months after the rendition <br />of any judgment in such action, to answer to the merits of the original action. Writs of <br />coram nobis, audita querela, and bills of review and bills in the nature of a bill of review, <br />are abolished, and the procedure for obtaining any relief from a judgment shall be by <br />motion as prescribed in these rules or by an independent action. <br />19. The final District Court Order in 2010PR204 was <br />issued June 23, 1013 and this C.R.C.P Rule 60 <br />Leland Coulter by obtaining an ORDER to dig them up. He had been buried for 22 years in the Coulter family plot in <br />Olinger Crown Hill before he was moved, without notice or hearing, to Florence Colorado to be buried in the family <br />plot of Sonny Vento; a brother -in -law that Leland Coulter had refused to talk to for 20 years before he passed <br />away. Further, Mrs. Coulter had not talked to Sonny Vento since 1995 when he tried to fraudulently exclude her <br />from her share of a Trust. Now, for no reason other than the fraudulent acts of Paula Coulter, Ted Coulter and John <br />Berman, Leland Coulter and Irene Coulter are buried in Florence Colorado instead of the Coulter family plot in <br />Olinger Crown Hill Cemetery. Every day is a further desecration of Leland Coulter's remains. <br />