My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-11-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981014
>
2013-11-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:37:11 PM
Creation date
11/12/2013 9:43:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/10/2013
Doc Name
Morgan Stanley Demand Letter
From
Peter Coulter
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
DIH
JHB
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
should be noted that John Berman was sanctioned <br />before by the Colorado Supreme Court for failing to <br />provide a professional invoice. In the instant <br />case, despite numerous requests, he has again <br />refused to ever (emphasis added) provide a <br />professional invoice despite extravagant requests <br />to the Court for attorney's fees in managing Mrs. <br />Coulter's affairs. <br />• And most ad rem here, Paula Coulter, her attorney <br />John Berman and Ms. Coulter's brother Ted Coulter, <br />to act with Fraud, Fraud on the Court and <br />Conspiracy to commit Fraud on the Court in <br />submitting a sworn Petition relying on Paula <br />Coulter's April 21, 2006 Power of Attorney, filed <br />with the Jefferson County District Court; to be <br />Mrs. Coulter's Fiduciary Conservator and Guardian <br />and purposely and fraudulently concealing Ted <br />Coulter's subsequent and exclusive power of <br />the record shows that John Berman was paid at least $40,000 in attorney's fees; he has not provided one <br />professional invoice; an act for which he has been previously sanctioned by the Colorado Supreme Court. (See <br />Colorado Supreme Court v. Berman 11PDJ078 previous admissions of misconduct.) The record shows that the <br />Appellant found errors in excess of $90,000 in some reports. And despite requirements to provide a list of Mrs. <br />Coulters assets in her current probate case (2013PR56; Jefferson County District Court) the Appellant and other <br />heirs have made no less than 10 separate requests to which Mr. Berman either did not respond or refused to <br />provide a list of assets. Further, despite protest from the Appellant to the Court, Paula Coulter has continued to <br />have a joint account with Mrs. Coulter in violation of Probate Rules making it impossible to know if funds were <br />being siphoned off by Paula Coulter. A flagrant example of the abuse of this joint account was an entry for $130 to <br />Camping World. It begs the question, What would a 90 year old woman with stage II Alzheimer locked in a care <br />center want with items from Camping World? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.