My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-10-31_REVISION - M1977284 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977284
>
2013-10-31_REVISION - M1977284 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:28:46 PM
Creation date
11/7/2013 8:47:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977284
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/31/2013
Doc Name
Drainage Design Plan Mineral Joe Mine
From
Cotter
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
TC1
SJM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mineral Joe Mine — Drainage Design Plan 8 <br />structures be designed with a permissible velocity of 5 ft /sec or Froude number of 0.6 for soil types A and <br />B and of 7 ft/sec or Froude number of 0.8 for soil types C and D. Engineered channels at the Mineral Joe <br />Mine are constructed in soil types C and D (rock), and are thus designed to meet the v = 7 ft/sec or Fr = 0.8 <br />criteria in erodible soils. <br />The Maximum Permissible Velocity of 7 ft/sec is applicable to earthen channels to prevent excessive <br />erosion and scour. Velocities of 7 to 13 ft/sec are acceptable for rubble -lined channels, 20 ft/sec for <br />concrete channels, 12 to 15 ft /sec for smooth and rough asphalt channels, respectively, and 30 ft/sec for <br />gunite (sprayed concrete) sections. At the Mineral Joe Mine, channels that are excavated into bedrock are <br />similar to rubble -lined or concrete channels, and higher permissible velocities may be acceptable in specific <br />sections or reaches of the channel. Erosion and sedimentation have less effect on fisheries and <br />macroinvertebrates in drainages at the toe of Monogram Mesa than at other locations, because surface <br />water is intermittent or ephemeral and there are no perennial streams (or "live streams ") as receiving <br />waters. <br />2.3.3 Culverts <br />Values for hydraulic headwater, tailwater, barrel flow rate and barrel velocity were determined using <br />methods and parameters provided in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) document HEC 22 <br />(FHWA 2009) and modeled in the FHWA software program HY -8 Version 7.2 (FHWA, 2012). Although <br />these design calculations indicate that smaller culverts could provide the carrying capacity required in some <br />sub - basins, all culverts installed by Cotter will be 18 -inch diameter minimum to reduce the potential of <br />plugging with wind -blown debris and animal denning activities. <br />2.3.4 Retention Pond and Spillway <br />The stormwater retention pond has been evaluated to determine its ability to contain the 10 -year 24 -hour <br />runoff volume with a minimum of 1.0 ft of freeboard, with freeboard reduced to 0.5 ft while passing the <br />100 yr 24 -hour event. A broad crested weir, as described in HEC 22, chapter 8 (FHWA, 2009), was used to <br />establish spillway design parameters and flow through the pond and spillway was evaluated using <br />HydroCAD& <br />2.3.5 Riprap / Granular Bedding / Gravel Mulch <br />Channel protection requirements, riprap sizing and riprap grading specifications for channels were <br />evaluated using HEC 15 (FHWA, 2005). Riprap sizing for the spillway was evaluated using the U.S. <br />Bureau of Reclamation Simplified Design Guidelines for Riprap Subjected to Overtopping Flow (Frizzell, <br />et al., 1997). <br />The channel analysis was conducted for the major stormwater conveyance structures (diversion ditches) <br />using the depths, widths, and side slope ratios established for each feature. The analysis determined that <br />most channels at the Mineral Joe Mine site do not require riprap, granular bedding, or gravel mulch <br />(Section 5.3). Where riprap is required, the riprap installed in channels will meet the criteria of HEC -15 <br />(FHWA, 2005), including but not limited to: <br />• The ratio of sizes of D100/1350 and D50/1320 shall fall between 3.0 and 1.52. <br />• Placed thickness should equal the diameter of the largest rock size in the gradation. <br />• Material shall be durable and angular but not slabby (length:thickness < 3). <br />• Riprap shall extend 1.0 ft above design flow level (Le, 1 -ft freeboard). <br />2 The largest rip rap size (D100) shall be no larger than 3 times the median particle size (D50) and no smaller than 1.5 times the <br />median particle size (D50). Similarly, median particle size (D50) shall be no more than 3 times and no less than 1.5 times the D20 <br />size. This specification assures an appropriate size gradation for erosion control. <br />414813.131029 Whetstone Associates • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.