My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-10-30_REVISION - M1977310 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977310
>
2013-10-30_REVISION - M1977310 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:28:45 PM
Creation date
11/5/2013 5:47:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977310
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/30/2013
Doc Name
DRAINAGE DESIGN PLAN FOR THE JD6 MINE
From
COTTER
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
TC1
SJM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JD -6 Mine — Drainage Design Plan 29 <br />The difficulty in quantifying the cumulative effects of very large numbers of small (i.e., <br />on -site) detention/retention facilities (Malcomb, 1982; Urbonas and Glidden, 1983) and the <br />virtual impossibility of assurance of their continued long -term performance or existence <br />(Debo, 1982; Prommersberger, 1984) requires the District to recognize in its floodplain <br />management only regional, publicly owned facilities. Nevertheless, upstream storage is <br />encouraged, such as with the 'Blue- Green" concept first described in Civil Engineering <br />magazine (Jones, 1967). <br />The runoff modeling performed for the JD -6 Mine using WinTR -55 conservatively does not take credit for <br />upstream storage. <br />4.6 Model Implementation of Stormwater Routing <br />Stormwater routing from the sub - basins, reaches, and pond described is shown schematically in Figure 14. <br />Although different symbols are used to identify three types of reaches (diversion ditches, borrow or <br />perimeter ditches, and naturally formed channels), the reaches are treated the same in the numerical model. <br />The outflow from the WinTR -55 model is broken into four outlets as shown in Figure 14, although, in the <br />physical system, all of the drainage from the site eventually reports to the same unnamed ephemeral <br />drainage. The stormwater modeling parameters (area, runoff curve number, T,, and receiving reach) for <br />each of the sub -basins shown in Figure 14 are summarized in Table 16. <br />A subset of the WinTR -55 model was also modeled in HydroCAD®, to more accurately evaluate pond <br />storage and spillway design for the planned SWRP. Figure 15 shows the four sub - basins and five reaches <br />reporting to the planned SWRP. HydroCAD® more accurately models the stage- storage relationships that <br />control pond discharge, spillway velocities, and scour. HydroCAD® can also be used to incorporate pond <br />and channel exfiltration, however, the exfiltration feature was not invoked in the planned SWRP model run <br />(JD6_PSWRP_02.hcp). <br />4148A.131028 Whetstone Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.