Laserfiche WebLink
COMES NOW the Appellant Peter Coulter, pro se, for his Motion <br />to void Paula Coulter's power of attorney and all orders and <br />findings of the District Court or alternatively for Leave and <br />Remand to the District Court pursuant to C.R.C.P. Rule 60 and <br />as good cause would state as follows: <br />1. CERTIFICATION <br />PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 121 § 1 -15(8) No party has made an entry of <br />appearance into this case other than the Appellant. Because of <br />the relevance and importance of this Motion, Movant will forward <br />courtesy copies to all parties listed in 117 below, in addition <br />to parties of In Re: Irene Coulter (deceased); 2010PR204 and <br />2013PR56,Jefferson County District Court. <br />2. COMPLIANCE WITH C.A.R. 28(k) <br />This C.R.C.P. Rule 60(Relief from Judgment or Order) (See pg. 8 <br />for recite of Rule.) Motion arises after the October 23rd, 2013 <br />discovery of a subsequent Power of Attorney dated June 19,2006, <br />naming Ted Coulter as sole agent for Irene Coulter; invalidated <br />the April 21, 2006 Power of Attorney for Irene Coulter that <br />Paula Coulter fraudulently produced to various persons, entities <br />and the Court (with the assistance of John Berman, Esq., an <br />officer of the Court) to persuade them that she /they were acting <br />on behalf of Mrs. Coulter via said Power of Attorney. C.R.C.P. <br />Rule 60(b)(2) gives the Court explicit authority and <br />jurisdiction to relieve parties such as the Appellant from <br />Judgments, Orders or Proceedings where adverse parties, such as <br />Paula Coulter and her counsel, John Berman committed Fraud <br />3 <br />