Laserfiche WebLink
hesitation." Hayden V. Rumsey Products, 196F. Supp. 988 <br />(W. D. N. Y. 1951) . <br />22. Where the relevant facts are undisputed, an appellate <br />court may make an independent determination as a matter of <br />law. See People v. Miranda— Olivas, 41 P.3d 658, 661 (Colo. <br />2001). Here, the undisputed facts establish such fraud as a <br />matter of law. See Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, <br />1118 (1st Cir.1989)( "A `fraud upon the court' occurs where <br />it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a <br />party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable <br />scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system's <br />ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly <br />influencing the trier or unfairly hampering the <br />presentation of the opposing party's claim or <br />defense. "). In re C.L.S., 252 P.3d 556, 561 (Colo. App. <br />2011) cert. denied, 11 SC 261, 2011 WL 2535031 (Colo. June <br />27, 2011), Therefore, Appellant is entitled to relief under <br />the "fraud upon the court" provision of Rule 60(b). <br />WHEREFORE, the Appellant Peter Coulter would pray the Court <br />grant relief as a matter of law and find that the April 21, <br />2006 Power of Attorney used by Paula Coulter and presented <br />by John Berman, Esq. in Jefferson County Case 2010PR204 is <br />void and is being used fraudulently including Fraud on the <br />14 <br />