My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-09-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019A
>
2013-09-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:25:14 PM
Creation date
10/31/2013 9:39:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/19/2013
Doc Name
Geotechnical Report South Taylor Excess Fills
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 21 Item 1 -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Colowyo Coal Mine <br />Attn: Mr. Tay Tonozzi <br />April 15, 2010 <br />Page 6 <br />Using the lower bound strength and including a 20- foot -thick layer of water are conservative <br />assumptions in our opinion. Analyzing the slope with lower bound strengths and /or <br />conservative water levels results in a calculated FS or 1.3 or greater. Considering lower bound <br />conservative conditions provides a check that if one of the strength parameters is lower than <br />estimated a reasonable FS remains. <br />Highwall Mining <br />In our Addendum No. 2 of our 2008 report we stated — "Two areas of highwall mining are <br />planned below excess spoil fills. The highwall mining configurations (web widths, barrier <br />pillar criteria, extraction ratios, etc.) were designed by Agapito Associates, Inc. (AAI) in their <br />report `Geotechnical Design and Operational Considerations for Highwall Mining, West Pit <br />South, F12 and E2 Seams' (November 23, 2005), and Addendum (April 13, 2007). <br />• In their report, AAI stated on page 10, `Web pillars are designed to remain stable and preclude <br />subsidence.' The planned excess spoil fill is generally confined in a valley and the out - slopes <br />at the downstream toes are relatively flat at 3.0:1 (H:V). In our opinion, the highwall mining <br />will not significantly affect spoil foundation conditions and should not reduce the global <br />stability of the spoil fill." <br />• <br />The locations of the highwall mining have not changed; the location /thickness of spoil fill <br />above has changed. We do not believe AAI designed the highwall mining pillars to support <br />deep spoil fill above the mined areas. However, it remains our opinion that subsidence of the <br />highwall mining areas will not adversely affect the global stability of the proposed spoil fills. <br />There is a possibility that subsidence of the highwall mined areas under deeper zones of fill <br />could occur and may result in subsidence at the surface of the fill. We did not perform a <br />specific analysis of the location, extent or degree of settlement/subsidence which might occur. <br />Based on our experience with abandoned mine subsidence and because deep air or hoist shafts <br />are not present, as in more typical abandoned mines, we do not expect sinkhole propagation <br />though the excess spoil to the surface to occur. If subsidence of the highwall mined area were <br />to occur, we expect trough -like zones of subsidence /settlement at the surface of the spoil fill. <br />These could affect surface grading and surface water drainage, but we do not expect it will have <br />adverse effects on the global stability of the fills. <br />Exhibit 21, Item 1 Revision Date: 12/06/10 <br />Addendum No. 3- 6 Revision No.: 'VR -?,A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.