My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-09-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019A
>
2013-09-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:25:14 PM
Creation date
10/31/2013 9:39:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/19/2013
Doc Name
Geotechnical Report South Taylor Excess Fills
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 21 Item 1 -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Colowyo Coal Mine <br />Attn: Mr. Tay Tonozzi <br />April 15, 2010 <br />Page 3 <br />Selection of Model Parameters <br />Laboratory test results, which form the basis for our selection of strength parameters, are <br />presented on Figures 12 through 15. Additional laboratory testing has been performed at the <br />site on spoil and clay soil since our initial analysis of the South Taylor (ST) fills in 2006. We <br />used this information to update our models for this analysis. The parameters for unit weight <br />and shear strength used in the models are shown in Tables D -1 through D -4 in Appendix D. <br />■ Spoil. In our previous (2006) analysis of ST spoil fills we used a shear strength <br />of 30 degrees friction and no cohesion for the spoil. Since then, large scale <br />direct shear testing was performed on five samples of spoil (Figure 12). The <br />results of the testing indicated a mean value of 35 degrees and cohesion of 750 <br />pounds per square foot (psf). <br />■ Clay. Since our 2006 analysis a consolidated - undrained (CU) triaxial test with <br />• pore pressure measurement was performed on a sample of valley bottom clay <br />soil from the Collom Temporary Spoil Fill area (Figure 13). In our opinion, this <br />test result represents the best estimate of long term drained strength for the <br />valley soils expected below the ST fills. This strength value of 31 degrees <br />friction and no cohesion was used as the base case, long term strength <br />(designated CU in Appendix D). These values compare well with the results of <br />previous direct shear testing of clay soils from valley deposits at other locations <br />• <br />across the site (Figure 14). <br />We selected the lower bound value for clay (23 degrees, cohesion of 370 psf) <br />shown on Figure 14 based on the results of the five laboratory test results shown <br />on this figure. In our opinion this value represents a reasonable lower bound for <br />the clayey sand (SC) and low plasticity sandy clay (CL) soil types found in the <br />South Taylor valleys. <br />■ Carbonaceous Mudstone (CMS). This material was presumed to be at the base <br />of the spoil below previously mined areas in Sections A -A' and C -C' and also <br />within the dipping bedrock wedge in section D -D' (refer to Figure 11). The <br />results of shear testing from previous investigations on this material are shown <br />on Figure 15. Note these values represent residual strength. The mean strength <br />Exhibit 21, Item 1 Revision Date: 12/06/10 <br />Addendum No. 3- 3 Revision No.: '`R -Al <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.