Laserfiche WebLink
mining in the damaged area, an asphalt patch was completed as a permanent repair: For both areas, a crack <br />sealant was used to fill minor cracks in the road. Refer to the semi - annual Subsidence Report for additional <br />details. <br />Powerlines - TC successfully undermined and subsided several powerlines during the mining of Panels 9 -, 6 -, <br />5 -, 4 -, 3- and 2- Right. The powerlines were monitored under the approved plan, and the resulting data has been <br />presented and summarized in the semi - annual Subsidence Reports. The monitoring results confirm that the lines <br />were subsided, but did not fail, nor were there any foundation failures. Experience and monitoring data verified <br />the initial contention that no significant impacts would result from undermining and subsiding powerlines. This <br />same reasoning was applied to the powerlines undermined by Panels 18- and 19- Right, with the same result. <br />Given TC's experience, it is reasonable to assume that undermining and subsiding the 69KV powerline that <br />overlies Panels 13- through 17 -Left should have no adverse effects on the powerline. <br />The subsidence prediction for the powerlines (NMD) is presented in Exhibit 7e -7, Twentymile Coal Company, <br />19 -Right Powerline Study, Final Report, prepared by SubTerra, Inc. in May 2003. As presented in the Report, <br />subsidence was projected to vary from 36 to 48 inches over the 19 -Right Panel. The powerlines are located <br />closer to the 18 -Right gateroad, which is the reason for the lower subsidence predictions, i.e. centerline of panel <br />versus actual location. TC worked with the utilities to devise a monitoring program for the affected powerlines, <br />given the fact that the lines run the entire length of the panel, as opposed to cutting across the panel. The <br />finalized plan was provided to the DRMS prior to undermining the structures. Although not indicated by the <br />subsidence projections or historic experience, the power company elected to establish a new powerline in <br />conjunction with system upgrades for their main south feeder line, with connections that would allow them to <br />jumper around the existing powerlines if significant adverse subsidence impacts were to occur. <br />Union Pacific Railroad Spur (formerly Denver & Rio Grande) - The Union Pacific railroad spur was <br />undermined and subsided by TC's mining of Panels 17- and 18 -Right in the NMD. The subsidence predictions <br />for the railroad track are presented in Exhibit 7e -8. The maximum subsidence predicted for the panel was <br />approximately 67 inches. Subsidence of the track required re- leveling the track, to the extent required, to assure <br />no disruption of service to the mine. Ballast was stockpiled or hauled -in to be used in this work. If required for <br />the creek crossings, fill material may be brought in from material that the UP has stockpiled during its normal <br />maintenance activities. The material will be placed and remain until the UP removes the Energy Spur. No <br />significant impact is anticipated to the track after the repair work is completed. This is substantiated by TC's <br />experience with re- leveling the track that passed over Panels 9- through 7- Right, and 12 -, 13 -, and 14- Right. <br />Fish Creek and the Associated AVF — Based on TC's previous experience and monitoring results for <br />undermining and subsidence of Fish Creek and its associated AVF, no material damage or diminution of use is <br />anticipated for Fish Creek for ongoing mining in the NMD and WMD. Exhibit 7e -6 contains the subsidence <br />predictions (NMD) for the creek. TC has gained a great deal of experience and data on the effects of <br />undermining and subsidence for Foidel Creek, Middle Creek and Fish Creek as a result of recent mining in the <br />SWMD (Panels 2- through 5- Left), EMD (Panels 2- through 10- Right), and NMD (Panels 12- through 19- <br />Right). Undermining and subsidence has resulted in temporary ponding in subsided areas, minor localized <br />changes in stream gradients, and excursion of flows from the defined channel into floodplain areas, particularly <br />during high flows. Except for the one isolated period, when flows in Foidel Creek were temporarily interrupted <br />for a period of 8 hours, due to ponding in a subsidence area, no significant damage or interruption of flows has <br />been observed in any of the affected creeks. Similar effects are anticipated for Fish Creek as mining progresses <br />through the NMD (Panels 17- and 18- Right) and into the WMD (Panels 12- through 16- Left). <br />Designated AVF areas along Fish Creek will be undermined and subsided by Panels 17- and 18 -Right (NMD) <br />and Panels 12- through 16 -Left (WMD). The location of the AVF in relation to the panels is shown on Maps 23 <br />and 23B. The area that TC proposes to undermine in the NMD in the Fish Creek drainage is located in parts of <br />Sections 10 and I 1 of T5N, R86W, and is identical to the area that P &M Coal Company was planning on <br />undermining and subsiding in its proposed Fish Creek Mine. P &M contracted with the consulting firm of <br />Kaman Tempo to prepare a report responding to the requirements of Rule 2.06.8(4). This report has been <br />incorporated into Exhibit 7 -e2. The conclusions presented in the report are consistent with TC's contention <br />TR 13 -82 2.05 -184.8 02/28/13 <br />